CVE-2025-22976
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL Injection vulnerability in dingfanzuCMS v.1.0 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via not filtering the content correctly at the "checkOrder.php" shopId module.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in dingfanzuCMS v.1.0 allows injection of malicious SQL queries through the shopId parameter in checkOrder.php due to improper input filtering. A local attacker can manipulate SQL queries to access, modify, or delete database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm dingfanzuCMS v1.0 is installedSearch the web root directory for files or directories that indicate dingfanzuCMS installation. Look for CMS-specific file structures, configuration files, or the checkOrder.php file itself.Affected if dingfanzuCMS v1.0 is present on the system
-
Locate checkOrder.phpFind checkOrder.php in the web application directory structure, typically within the public-facing web root.Affected if checkOrder.php exists in the application
-
Inspect SQL query handling for shopId parameterOpen checkOrder.php and examine how the shopId parameter is used in database operations. Look for SQL query construction where shopId is directly concatenated or interpolated into the query string.Affected if shopId is used in SQL queries without parameterized queries or input validation
-
Verify if input validation exists on shopIdSearch the checkOrder.php file for input validation routines (such as type checking, sanitization functions, or allowlists) applied to the shopId parameter before its use in database queries.Affected if No input validation is performed on shopId before SQL execution
-
Check for prepared statementsReview the database interaction code in checkOrder.php to determine if PDO prepared statements, mysqli prepared statements, or other parameterized query methods are used for the shopId parameter.Affected if Dynamic SQL query construction is used instead of prepared statements
The environment is affected if dingfanzuCMS v1.0 is installed and checkOrder.php contains SQL queries using the shopId parameter without prepared statements or input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL query construction with parameterized queries (prepared statements) and implement strict input validation on all user-supplied parameters before using them in database operations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22976 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22976 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data