CVE-2025-23196
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA code injection vulnerability exists in the Ambari Alert Definition feature, allowing authenticated users to inject and execute arbitrary shell commands. The vulnerability arises when defining alert scripts, where the script filename field is executed using `sh -c`. An attacker with authenticated access can exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious commands, leading to remote code execution on the server. The issue has been fixed in the latest versions of Ambari.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA code injection vulnerability in Apache Ambari's Alert Definition feature allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary shell commands through the script filename field, which gets executed via `sh -c`. This enables remote code execution on the Ambari server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.7.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Ambari installation and versionRun `ambari-server --version` or check the RPM/DEB package version with `rpm -q ambari-server` or `dpkg -l ambari-server`Affected if Installed version is lower than 2.7.9 (e.g., 2.7.8, 2.7.7, etc.)
-
Verify Alert Definition REST API accessibilityQuery the Ambari API endpoint `/api/v1/alert_definitions` using curl with valid authentication credentials: `curl -u <user>:<pass> -k https://<ambari-host>:8080/api/v1/alert_definitions`Affected if The API returns alert definitions and the user has access to create or modify them
-
Inspect alert definitions for suspicious script filenamesReview the output from the alert_definitions API and examine the `source->scriptName` or `source->script` fields for unusual patterns such as: shell metacharacters (;, |, &&, ||), commands appended after the script name, or unexpected file extensionsAffected if Any alert definition contains a scriptName field with shell command injection payloads or unexpected commands
-
Check Ambari audit logs for alert definition modificationsReview Ambari audit logs (typically in /var/log/ambari-audit/ or via the Ambari UI audit tab) for recent CREATE or UPDATE operations on alert_definitions, looking for entries with unusual script filenamesAffected if There are recent alert definition modifications with suspicious script filenames or commands
-
Examine Ambari server process execution historyReview system process logs or audit logs on the Ambari server host for execution patterns matching `sh -c` commands spawned by the ambari user, particularly those involving alert scripts: `grep 'sh.*-c.*alert' /var/log/ambari-server/ambari-server.log`Affected if There are log entries showing execution of alert scripts containing injected commands beyond simple script file paths
You are affected if Ambari version is below 2.7.9 AND your authenticated users have access to create or modify alert definitions with custom script filenames.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.7.9
Upgrade Ambari to the latest version that includes the fix for CVE-2025-23196. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict access to the Alert Definition feature to only trusted administrative users.
Ambari 2.7.9 or later
- 1. Backup the existing Ambari configuration and database before upgrading.
- 2. Download Apache Ambari 2.7.9 or later from the official Apache Ambari repository.
- 3. Stop all Ambari services and the Ambari Server using 'ambari-server stop'.
- 4. Upgrade the Ambari Server by running the ambari-server upgrade command with the new Ambari distribution.
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Ambari Server version.
- 6. Start the Ambari Server and confirm all services start normally.
- 7. Validate that the Alert Definition feature no longer allows command injection by testing with a benign script name.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23196 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23196 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data