OpenharmonyOperating system · Openatom

CVE-2025-23240

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.0.2 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
in OpenHarmony v5.0.2 and prior versions allow a local attacker arbitrary code execution in pre-installed apps through out-of-bounds write. This vulnerability can be exploited only in restricted scenarios.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenHarmony v5.0.2 and prior versions contain an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in pre-installed system applications. A local attacker with access to the device can exploit this memory corruption flaw to achieve arbitrary code execution within the context of the targeted pre-installed app. The 'restricted scenarios' note indicates that some security controls limit but do not fully prevent exploitation.

MitigationApply any available vendor patches for OpenHarmony; if no patch is available, consider restricting local physical access and reviewing the permissions model for pre-installed applications to limit the attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenharmonyOperating system
Affected:>= 4.1.0, <= 5.0.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the OpenHarmony version
    Check the system settings or use the 'getprop' command (if available) to retrieve the OpenHarmony version number. This is typically found under Settings > About Device > Version or via command line tools like 'hidumper -s 0' or 'param get const.product.software.version'.
    Affected if The installed version falls within the range >= 4.1.0 and <= 5.0.2, indicating the device is running a vulnerable version.
  2. Confirm the presence of pre-installed system applications
    Review the list of installed applications on the device. Pre-installed system apps are typically located in /system/apps or /preinstall directories, or can be enumerated via application management commands like 'bm dump -a' on OpenHarmony devices.
    Affected if The device contains pre-installed system applications, which are the specific targets of this vulnerability.
  3. Verify local physical access conditions
    Assess whether the device permits local physical access by unauthorized users. Check if the device is in a secured location, uses screen lock, or has additional authentication barriers preventing direct physical interaction.
    Affected if The device allows physical access by local attackers, which is required to exploit this vulnerability.
  4. Review application permission model
    Examine the permissions granted to pre-installed system applications. Check if these applications run with elevated privileges or have capabilities that could be leveraged for arbitrary code execution if exploited.
    Affected if Pre-installed applications possess permissions or capabilities that could be abused to achieve code execution upon successful exploitation.

The environment is affected if the device runs OpenHarmony version 4.1.0 through 5.0.2 and contains pre-installed system applications that could be accessed by a local attacker with physical access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.0.2
Interim mitigation

Apply any available vendor patches for OpenHarmony; if no patch is available, consider restricting local physical access and reviewing the permissions model for pre-installed applications to limit the attack surface.

Fix this in Openharmony Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA5.0 h
33.0 hours of engineering $5,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,216.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23240 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23240 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data