CVE-2025-23385
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn JetBrains ReSharper before 2024.3.4, 2024.2.8, and 2024.1.7, Rider before 2024.3.4, 2024.2.8, and 2024.1.7, dotTrace before 2024.3.4, 2024.2.8, and 2024.1.7, ETW Host Service before 16.43, Local Privilege Escalation via the ETW Host Service was possible
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the JetBrains ETW Host Service (versions prior to 16.43 and prior to ReSharper/Rider/dotTrace 2024.3.4/2024.2.8/2024.1.7). The ETW Host Service, which runs with elevated privileges, can be exploited by a local attacker to gain higher-level system privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2024.1.7>= 2024.2, < 2024.2.8>= 2024.3, < 2024.3.4< 16.43< 2024.1.7>= 2024.2, < 2024.2.8>= 2024.3, < 2024.3.4< 2024.1.7>= 2024.2.0, < 2024.2.8>= 2024.3.0, < 2024.3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if JetBrains ETW Host Service is installedOpen Services (services.msc) and look for a service named 'JetBrains ETW Host Service' or check the Windows registry at HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services for entries containing 'JetBrains ETW Host'. Alternatively, check Program Files or Program Files (x86) for a JetBrains folder containing ETW Host executable.Affected if The ETW Host Service is present on the system
-
Determine the version of ETW Host ServiceIf installed, right-click the ETW Host Service executable (typically in C:\Program Files\JetBrains\ETW Host\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\JetBrains\ETW Host\), select Properties, and check the Details tab for the File Version. Or run: wmic service where "name like '%etw%'" get name,displayname,pathnameAffected if The version is less than 16.43 or cannot be determined (indicating an unpatched version)
-
Check for installed JetBrains ReSharperCheck for ReSharper installation by looking in the Visual Studio extensions folder (%LocalAppData%\Microsoft\VisualStudio\<version>\Extensions\*) or registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\<version>\Extensions\ for folders containing 'JetBrains' or 'ReSharper'. Or check Programs and Features for 'ReSharper'.Affected if ReSharper is installed with version < 2024.1.7, or >= 2024.2.0 and < 2024.2.8, or >= 2024.3.0 and < 2024.3.4
-
Check for installed JetBrains RiderCheck Programs and Features for 'JetBrains Rider', or look in C:\Program Files\JetBrains\JetBrains Rider\ for the install directory. Right-click the Rider executable and check File Version under Details.Affected if Rider is installed with version < 2024.1.7, or >= 2024.2.0 and < 2024.2.8, or >= 2024.3.0 and < 2024.3.4
-
Check for installed JetBrains dotTraceCheck Programs and Features for 'JetBrains dotTrace', or look in C:\Program Files\JetBrains\dotTrace\ for the install directory. Right-click the dotTrace executable and check File Version under Details.Affected if dotTrace is installed with version < 2024.1.7, or >= 2024.2.0 and < 2024.2.8, or >= 2024.3.0 and < 2024.3.4
A system is affected if the JetBrains ETW Host Service version is below 16.43, or if any of ReSharper, Rider, or dotTrace are installed in the vulnerable version ranges, and the attacker has local access to the machine.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.432024.1.72024.2.8
Update all affected JetBrains products (ReSharper, Rider, dotTrace) to versions 2024.3.4, 2024.2.8, or 2024.1.7, and update the ETW Host Service to version 16.43 or later.
2024.3.4 (or later stable release) for Rider/ReSharper/dotTrace; version 16.43 or later for ETW Host Service
- Identify which JetBrains products are installed (Rider, ReSharper, dotTrace, or ETW Host Service)
- Check the current version of each installed product in the IDE's About dialog or system installed programs
- For Rider: Upgrade to version 2024.3.4, 2024.2.8, or 2024.1.7 or later via JetBrains Toolbox or Check for Updates
- For ReSharper: Upgrade to version 2024.3.4, 2024.2.8, or 2024.1.7 or later via JetBrains Toolbox or Visual Studio extensions
- For dotTrace: Upgrade to version 2024.3.4, 2024.2.8, or 2024.1.7 or later
- For ETW Host Service: Upgrade to version 16.43 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23385 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23385 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data