Incorrect Privilege AssignmentWeakness · CWE-266

CVE-2025-23391

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
97/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in SUSE rancher allows a Restricted Administrator to change the password of Administrators and take over their accounts. This issue affects rancher: from 2.8.0 before 2.8.14, from 2.9.0 before 2.9.8, from 2.10.0 before 2.10.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a privilege escalation vulnerability in SUSE Rancher where a Restricted Administrator (a role intended to have limited permissions) can change the password of full Administrator accounts, allowing complete account takeover. The vulnerability stems from incorrect privilege assignment in Ranche's role-based access control (RBAC) system that fails to properly restrict password modification privileges for lower-privileged users.

MitigationUpgrade Rancher to version 2.8.14, 2.9.8, or 2.10.4 or later. Immediately audit users with Restricted Administrator roles and consider revoking such privileges until the patch is applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine Rancher server version
    Run 'kubectl get globalsettings rancher-version -o jsonpath={.value}' in the Rancher management cluster, or check the UI under the gear icon > About Rancher
    Affected if Version is earlier than 2.8.14, 2.9.8, or 2.10.4
  2. Verify presence of Restricted Administrator role
    List users with the 'restricted-admin' cluster role binding or check for users assigned the restricted-admin role via 'kubectl get clusterrolebindings -o jsonpath="{.items[?(@.roleRef.name==\"restricted-admin\")].subjects}"'
    Affected if Any user is assigned the restricted-admin role
  3. Confirm existence of full Administrator accounts
    Check for users with the 'admin' role or 'administrator' cluster role binding via 'kubectl get clusterrolebindings -o jsonpath="{.items[?(@.roleRef.name==\"admin\")].subjects}"'
    Affected if Full Administrator accounts exist in the system

Environment is affected if Rancher version is below 2.8.14/2.9.8/2.10.4 AND both Restricted Administrator users and full Administrator accounts coexist in the deployment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Rancher to version 2.8.14, 2.9.8, or 2.10.4 or later. Immediately audit users with Restricted Administrator roles and consider revoking such privileges until the patch is applied.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

2.8.14, 2.9.8, or 2.10.4 (choose the latest stable release for your major version branch)

  1. Identify your current Rancher version using the Rancher UI or CLI
  2. For Rancher 2.8.x: Upgrade to version 2.8.14 or later
  3. For Rancher 2.9.x: Upgrade to version 2.9.8 or later
  4. For Rancher 2.10.x: Upgrade to version 2.10.4 or later
  5. Backup your Rancher installation and etcd data before performing the upgrade
  6. Follow the standard Rancher upgrade documentation for your deployment method (Docker, Helm, or RKE)
  7. After upgrade, verify that Restricted Administrator users can no longer change Administrator passwords
  8. Confirm all users can authenticate with their existing credentials
Caveat Review Rancher release notes for your target version for any breaking changes; minor version upgrades typically have minimal compatibility issues

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,440
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23391 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23391 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data