CVE-2025-23409
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedin OpenHarmony v5.0.2 and prior versions allow a local attacker arbitrary code execution in pre-installed apps through use after free. This vulnerability can be exploited only in restricted scenarios.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability in OpenHarmony v5.0.2 and prior versions allows a local attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution within pre-installed applications. The vulnerability stems from improper memory management where memory is accessed after being freed, leading to memory corruption that can be leveraged for code execution in the restricted context of pre-installed apps.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.1.0, <= 5.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenHarmony versionCheck the system version by running 'getprop ro.build.version.sdk' or checking /system/build.prop for the 'ro.build.version.release' or 'ro.build.version.preview_sdk' values that indicate the OpenHarmony release versionAffected if The version falls within the range >= 4.1.0 and <= 5.0.2 as shown in the version properties
-
Verify pre-installed applications are in useReview the list of installed applications using 'bm dump -a' or checking the /preinstall directory on the device to confirm presence of pre-installed apps that run with elevated privilegesAffected if Pre-installed applications are present and actively running on the system
-
Monitor for use-after-free symptomsCheck system logs (logcat) for crash reports or ANR (Application Not Responding) events that reference memory corruption, double-free, or heap corruption patterns in pre-installed app processesAffected if Crash logs or memory error traces appear in logcat for pre-installed application processes
-
Check for abnormal process behaviorUse 'ps -A' to list running processes and examine any pre-installed app processes for unexpected behavior or examine dmesg for memory management error messagesAffected if Pre-installed app processes exhibit unexpected behavior or memory-related error messages appear in kernel logs
You are affected if your OpenHarmony device runs version 4.1.0 through 5.0.2 and you have pre-installed applications active on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches for OpenHarmony v5.0.2 and prior versions when available. Review and minimize privileges of pre-installed applications, and implement application sandboxing controls to limit the impact of successful exploitation.
OpenHarmony release > 5.0.2 (verify the specific fixed version in official OpenHarmony security advisories on gitee.com)
- 1. Identify all OpenHarmony devices/systems running versions 4.1.0 through 5.0.2 in your environment
- 2. Check the official OpenHarmony release notes or gitee.com repository for the security update containing the fix for CVE-2025-23409
- 3. Plan an upgrade to the first OpenHarmony release that includes the patch for this Use After Free vulnerability
- 4. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first to verify compatibility
- 5. Apply the upgrade to production systems following standard change management procedures
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23409 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23409 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data