CVE-2025-2344
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in IROAD Dash Cam X5 and Dash Cam X6 up to 20250308. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation leads to missing authentication. The attack may be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAuthenticated access to IROAD Dash Cam X5 and X6 devices can be bypassed remotely through unauthenticated API endpoint access. Attackers can manipulate API requests to bypass authentication controls on the dash cam's web/API interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the dash cam modelCheck the device label, web interface login page, or system information page for the exact model number (X5 or X6)Affected if The device is an IROAD Dash Cam X5 or X6 model
-
Verify the web/API interface is network-accessibleAttempt to access the device's web interface over HTTP/HTTPS from a remote location, or check firewall/network rules that allow access to the device's IP address on ports 80, 443, or any custom API portAffected if The dash cam's web interface or API endpoints are reachable from the network
-
Test for unauthenticated API endpoint accessSend a direct HTTP request to common API paths on the device (such as /api/, /api/login, or similar endpoints) without providing any authentication credentials and observe if the device returns valid data or allows accessAffected if API requests without authentication tokens or session cookies return successful responses or sensitive device data
-
Check network exposure to untrusted networksReview network configuration to determine if the dash cam is directly accessible from the internet or from less-trusted network segments (guest networks, external subnets)Affected if The device is accessible from networks outside the local trusted network without firewall filtering
You are affected if you own an IROAD Dash Cam X5 or X6 with its web/API interface exposed to the network and that interface permits unauthenticated access to API endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataNetwork segmentation and firewall rules should isolate dash cam devices from untrusted networks. Consider implementing additional authentication layers (e.g., VPN) for any administrative access. Monitor API traffic for anomalous requests.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2344 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2344 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data