CVE-2025-2345
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, was found in IROAD Dash Cam X5 and Dash Cam X6 up to 20250308. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn improper authorization vulnerability in IROAD Dash Cam X5 and X6 devices allows remote attackers to bypass authentication controls. The specific authorization mechanism or attack vector is not detailed in the available information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IROAD Dash Cam model in your environmentLocate the physical device or check your device inventory/network scans for IROAD Dash Cam X5 or XROAD Dash Cam X6 modelsAffected if The device is an IROAD Dash Cam X5 or X6 model
-
Determine the installed firmware versionAccess the dash cam settings via its mobile app or web interface and locate the firmware version information, or check the device label/manual for version detailsAffected if The firmware version matches or falls within the affected X5/X6 version range (version comparison required against any known affected releases)
-
Verify network accessibility of the dash camScan your network to determine if the dash cam web interface or mobile app API is reachable from networks outside your trusted internal network segmentAffected if The dash cam is directly accessible from the internet or from untrusted network segments without firewall restrictions
-
Check for exposed management interfacesTest connectivity to the dash cam IP on common HTTP/HTTPS ports (typically 80, 443, 8080) from an untrusted external location or perform a port scan from outside your perimeterAffected if The dash cam responds to authentication or management requests from outside the trusted network
-
Confirm authentication enforcementAttempt to access the dash cam interface without credentials to see if authentication is properly enforced, or review any available access logs for unauthenticated access attemptsAffected if Authentication can be bypassed or the interface allows unauthenticated access to sensitive functions
Your environment is affected if you have an IROAD Dash Cam X5 or X6 device that is accessible from untrusted networks and allows unauthenticated or improperly authorized access to its interface or APIs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the vendor did not respond to disclosure and no patch is available, network segmentation isolating dash cams from untrusted networks and disabling external access is recommended as a compensating control.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation80.0 h
- Testing40.0 h
- Review / QA32.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $44,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2345 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2345 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data