CVE-2025-2351
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical was found in DayCloud StudentManage 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/adminScoreUrl of the component Login Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument query leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in DayCloud StudentManage 1.0's login endpoint (/admin/adminScoreUrl) allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands via the 'query' parameter. The lack of input sanitization on this parameter enables database manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm DayCloud StudentManage is installedIdentify the application by reviewing your web server's deployed applications or checking the application banner. Look for 'DayCloud StudentManage' in the application name or title.Affected if The application is DayCloud StudentManage
-
Verify the application versionCheck the installed version of DayCloud StudentManage through the admin interface, version file, or application metadata. Compare against version 1.0.Affected if The version is 1.0 or falls within the 1.x range
-
Confirm the /admin/adminScoreUrl endpoint existsAccess the URL path /admin/adminScoreUrl on your server to verify the endpoint is present and reachable.Affected if The endpoint returns a valid response (200 OK or similar) rather than a 404 error
-
Test if the query parameter accepts inputSend a request to /admin/adminScoreUrl with a test value in the 'query' parameter (for example: ?query=test) and observe if the application processes it without rejecting or sanitizing the input.Affected if The application accepts the query parameter without strict input validation or returns SQL-related errors indicating unsanitized input is processed
You are affected if DayCloud StudentManage version 1.0 is running and the /admin/adminScoreUrl endpoint is accessible with an unsanitized 'query' parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements, implement strict input validation on all user-controlled parameters, and deploy a WAF as a compensating control until the code fix is deployed.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2351 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2351 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data