CVE-2025-23613
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in mediabeta WP Journal wpjournal allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP Journal: from n/a through <= 1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe WP Journal plugin (wpjournal) by mediabeta contains a missing authorization vulnerability allowing attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. This broken access control issue enables unauthorized users to perform actions or access resources that should require higher privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WP Journal plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin panel > Plugins > Installed Plugins, or inspect the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the wpjournal folderAffected if The WP Journal plugin by mediabeta is present on the WordPress site
-
Determine installed WP Journal versionCheck the plugin header in wpjournal.php file for the Version field, or view in WordPress plugin listAffected if Unable to confirm the installed version is patched (no fixed version specified in CVE)
-
Identify sensitive plugin endpointsReview plugin source files in /wp-content/plugins/wpjournal/ for PHP files containing add_action or add_shortcode calls, particularly admin or AJAX handlersAffected if Plugin exposes functionality without checking user capabilities via current_user_can() or similar authorization functions
-
Test access control on plugin functionalityUse a low-privilege test account (subscriber level) to access suspected sensitive URLs or trigger plugin shortcodes observed in source codeAffected if Low-privilege users can perform actions or access data that should require administrator privileges
-
Check user role capability enforcementGrep plugin PHP files for current_user_can(), is_user_logged_in(), wp_get_current_user(), or check_ajax_referer functions to verify authorization exists on sensitive operationsAffected if Plugin files contain sensitive operations (database writes, settings changes, content access) without capability checks
The site is affected if the WP Journal plugin is installed and lacks proper capability checks on sensitive functions, allowing unauthorized access by low-privilege users
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive functions and endpoints, ensuring users can only access resources and perform actions appropriate to their privilege level.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23613 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23613 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data