Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-23649

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kreg Steppe Auphonic Importer auphonic-importer allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Auphonic Importer: from n/a through <= 1.5.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Auphonic Importer plugin allows attackers to craft malicious requests that result in Stored XSS. When an authenticated user visits a specially crafted page or clicks a malicious link, the attacker's payload is stored in the application and executes whenever other users view the affected content.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and validate Origin/Referer headers. Additionally, apply proper output encoding and input validation to prevent Stored XSS execution of malicious payloads.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate Auphonic Importer plugin files
    Check your site's plugin directory (typically wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'auphonic-importer' or similar. List all plugins and look for Auphonic-related names.
    Affected if The plugin folder exists in the plugins directory.
  2. Identify the installed version
    Open the main plugin PHP file (often named plugin-name.php or index.php inside the plugin folder) and look for a version comment or constant near the top of the file. Alternatively, check the plugin header for 'Version:' information.
    Affected if You cannot determine the version, or the version is older than the current stable release available from the vendor.
  3. Verify if the plugin is active
    In the WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and check whether Auphonic Importer is listed as Active, or query the wp_options table for the 'active_plugins' option.
    Affected if The plugin shows as Active in the admin or the 'active_plugins' option contains the plugin.
  4. Inspect plugin forms for CSRF protection
    Navigate to the Auphonic Importer settings page in the admin panel. View the page source (right-click > View Page Source) and search for forms. Check if each form contains an input field with a name like 'csrf', 'token', 'nonce', or similar, or inspect the request headers for CSRF token validation.
    Affected if Forms on the Auphonic Importer settings page lack CSRF token fields or nonce parameters.
  5. Review stored content for unexpected scripts
    Check any content areas where Auphonic Importer stores or processes data (such as post meta, options, or imported content). Query the database for suspicious script tags or javascript: URIs in fields associated with the plugin.
    Affected if Unexpected JavaScript code is found stored in plugin-related database entries.

If the Auphonic Importer plugin is installed, active, and its forms lack CSRF token protection, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2025-23649.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and validate Origin/Referer headers. Additionally, apply proper output encoding and input validation to prevent Stored XSS execution of malicious payloads.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23649 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23649 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data