Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-23661

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ryscript NV Slider nv-slider allows Stored XSS.This issue affects NV Slider: from n/a through <= 1.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A CSRF vulnerability in ryscript NV Slider (versions <=1.6) allows attackers to craft malicious requests that store XSS payloads within the slider component. When other users view or interact with the compromised slider, the stored JavaScript executes in their browsers, enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or further website compromise.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and validate the Origin/Referer headers. Additionally, apply proper output encoding and input validation to prevent XSS injection via the CSRF vector.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if NV Slider is installed
    Locate the ryscript NV Slider component in your CMS/plugins directory, or check your website's frontend for any slider functionality that matches the NV Slider plugin behavior
    Affected if The plugin/component is present in your environment
  2. Verify the installed version
    Check the version metadata of the NV Slider plugin (typically found in a version.php, plugin.json, or readme file within the plugin directory)
    Affected if The installed version is 1.6 or any version lower than 1.6
  3. Inspect slider configuration for XSS payloads
    Access the database tables or configuration files where slider content is stored (often named like nv_slider_slides, slider_items, or similar), and examine any text fields for suspicious patterns such as <script tags, javascript: URIs, event handlers like onload/onerror, or encoded variations
    Affected if Any slider records contain XSS payloads (script tags, javascript: protocols, or event handler attributes)
  4. Check for CSRF protection on slider admin actions
    Examine the HTTP requests made when saving/updating slider content through the admin interface; verify if anti-CSRF tokens are included in the request headers or form data for state-changing operations
    Affected if State-changing slider operations (add/edit/delete slides) lack CSRF token validation

You are affected if NV Slider version 1.6 or lower is installed AND the slider admin interface lacks CSRF protection, or if XSS payloads are already present in slider data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and validate the Origin/Referer headers. Additionally, apply proper output encoding and input validation to prevent XSS injection via the CSRF vector.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Latest version of NV Slider (rys NV Slider) from vendor repository (version > 1.6)

  1. Identify the current version of NV Slider (rys NV Slider) being used in the application
  2. Check the official ryscript plugin repository or WordPress plugin directory for the latest available version of NV Slider
  3. Upgrade NV Slider to the latest version available from the vendor (version higher than 1.6)
  4. After upgrading, verify that the CSRF protection mechanisms are properly implemented by testing form submissions and slider configuration changes
  5. Ensure that the WordPress nonce verification is in place for all admin actions related to slider management
Caveat Review plugin changelog for any breaking changes or deprecated features between version 1.6 and the target version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23661 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23661 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data