Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-23698

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ivanra10 WP Custom Google Search wp-custom-google-search allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Custom Google Search: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A CSRF vulnerability in the WP Custom Google Search plugin allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into submitting malicious requests that store XSS payloads in the plugin's settings. Since the XSS is stored, it will execute whenever users access pages containing the affected plugin content.

MitigationImplement WordPress nonces for all admin actions and apply proper input sanitization and output escaping on all user-supplied values before storing and displaying them.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WP Custom Google Search plugin is installed
    Go to WordPress Admin > Plugins and look for 'WP Custom Google Search' in the installed plugins list. Note whether it is activated.
    Affected if The plugin is installed and activated in the WordPress environment
  2. Identify the installed plugin version
    Click on the plugin name in the plugins list to view its details, or inspect the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/wp-custom-google-search/*.php to read the Version field.
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within any affected version ranges (compare to official WordPress plugin repository release notes)
  3. Inspect plugin settings for suspicious stored content
    Navigate to the plugin settings page (usually under Settings > WP Custom Google Search or a dedicated menu item). Examine all text fields, especially search box labels, placeholder text, and URL configuration fields. Look for any unexpected JavaScript code, script tags, or HTML attributes like onload, onerror, or onclick.
    Affected if The plugin settings contain any unsanitized user-supplied values that include JavaScript code or HTML event handlers
  4. Review page source for unsanitized output
    Visit a page where the WP Custom Google Search widget or shortcode is rendered. Right-click and view page source. Search for the plugin settings values and verify they are properly escaped (e.g., look for &lt;script&gt; or &quot; instead of raw <script> or ").
    Affected if Raw, unescaped HTML or JavaScript from plugin settings appears in the page source
  5. Check for unauthorized admin actions
    Review server access logs and WordPress audit logs for any POST requests to admin-ajax.php or plugin settings pages that originated from unexpected IP addresses or during times when admin users were not active.
    Affected if There are administrative actions on the plugin settings from unexpected sources indicating potential CSRF exploitation

A user is affected if the WP Custom Google Search plugin is installed and its settings contain unsanitized XSS payloads or if the plugin lacks nonce protection allowing CSRF-triggered stored XSS.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement WordPress nonces for all admin actions and apply proper input sanitization and output escaping on all user-supplied values before storing and displaying them.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23698 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23698 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data