CVE-2025-23713
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in artanik Hack me if you can hack-me-if-you-can allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Hack me if you can: from n/a through <= 1.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA CSRF vulnerability in the hack-me-if-you-can plugin <= 1.2 allows attackers to craft malicious requests that cause Stored XSS to be injected into the application. The lack of anti-CSRF tokens on state-changing operations enables attackers to trick authenticated users into executing unintended actions that persist malicious scripts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if hack-me-if-you-can plugin is installedCheck your CMS/plugin directory for the hack-me-if-you-can plugin folder or check the installed plugins list in your admin panelAffected if The plugin is present in the system
-
Determine the installed version of the pluginLocate the plugin version file (such as version.php, plugin.json, or readme.txt) or check the version displayed in your admin panel plugin listAffected if The version is 1.2 or lower
-
Inspect state-changing forms for anti-CSRF tokensView the HTML source of forms in the plugin admin panel and public-facing pages, checking if each form includes a hidden CSRF token field (commonly named _token, csrf_token, nonce, or wpnonce)Affected if Forms lack anti-CSRF token fields or server-side token validation
-
Verify input validation and output encodingReview the plugin PHP source code for proper use of sanitization functions (such as htmlspecialchars, esc_html, sanitize_text_field) on user inputs that are stored and later displayedAffected if User-supplied data is not sanitized before storage or encoded before output to browser
If the hack-me-if-you-can plugin version 1.2 or lower is installed and state-changing operations lack anti-CSRF tokens, the system is vulnerable to CVE-2025-23713
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all forms and state-changing operations, combined with proper input validation and output encoding to prevent stored XSS execution.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23713 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23713 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data