CVE-2025-23778
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Pravin Durugkar User Sync ActiveCampaign registered-user-sync-activecampaign allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects User Sync ActiveCampaign: from n/a through <= 1.3.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA missing authorization vulnerability in the User Sync ActiveCampaign WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.3.2) allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized synchronization operations or access to sensitive user data within the plugin functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins and look for 'User Sync ActiveCampaign' in the installed plugins list, or check for the plugin directory in wp-content/plugins/ containing 'activecampaign' or 'user-sync' in the nameAffected if The plugin appears in the WordPress installation's plugin list
-
Check installed version numberIn WordPress Admin > Plugins, click on the plugin to view its details and read the version number displayed, or open the main plugin PHP file and locate the 'Version' header in the plugin comment blockAffected if The displayed version is 1.3.2 or lower
-
Verify version is within vulnerable rangeCompare the found version against the affected range: any version 1.3.2 or below is vulnerableAffected if Installed version is less than or equal to 1.3.2
-
Confirm plugin is activeIn WordPress Admin > Plugins, verify the 'User Sync ActiveCampaign' plugin shows as 'Active' or 'Enabled'Affected if Plugin status is Active - the vulnerability is only exploitable when the plugin is enabled
You are affected if the User Sync ActiveCampaign plugin is installed, active, and running version 1.3.2 or lower.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest patched version of the User Sync ActiveCampaign plugin once available, or implement proper authorization checks on all plugin endpoints and remove/disable the plugin until patched.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23778 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23778 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data