CVE-2025-24306
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') issue exists in +F FS010M versions prior to V2.0.0_1101. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by a remote authenticated attacker with an administrative privilege.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in +F FS010M devices versions prior to V2.0.0_1101 allows a remote authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary operating system commands due to improper neutralization of special elements in input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the device admin panel or check the device label/bootlog to confirm the model is +F FS010MAffected if The device is a +F FS010M unit
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the device admin interface and navigate to the firmware/version information page, or use the command 'AT+CGMR' or similar to query the firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is lower than V2.0.0_1101 or cannot be determined to be V2.0.0_1101 or later
-
Verify remote admin access is enabledCheck the device network settings for remote management or web interface access (often found under Administration, Security, or Network settings)Affected if Remote administrative access is enabled and reachable from untrusted networks
-
Check admin account accessibilityReview the list of administrative accounts and verify if default credentials are in use or if the admin panel is exposed without strong authentication controlsAffected if Administrative credentials are accessible or the admin interface is exposed to network attackers
The environment is affected if the device is a +F FS010M with firmware version prior to V2.0.0_1101 and has its administrative interface remotely accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade +F FS010M firmware to version V2.0.0_1101 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
V2.0.0_1101
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the +F FS010M device
- 2. If the current version is prior to V2.0.0_1101, obtain the V2.0.0_1101 firmware update from the official vendor (Fsi+ or authorized distribution channels)
- 3. Back up the current device configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- 4. Apply the V2.0.0_1101 firmware update following the vendor's official upgrade procedure
- 5. After upgrade, verify the device is functioning correctly and confirm the new firmware version displays as V2.0.0_1101 or later
- 6. Review administrative accounts and change passwords as a security best practice following the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24306 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24306 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data