CVE-2025-24330
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSending a crafted SOAP "provision" operation message PlanId field within the Mobile Network Operator (MNO) internal Radio Access Network (RAN) management network can cause path traversal issue in Nokia Single RAN baseband software with versions earlier than release 24R1-SR 1.0 MP. This issue has been corrected to release 24R1-SR 1.0 MP and later. Beginning with release 24R1-SR 1.0 MP, the OAM service software performed PlanId field input validations mitigate the reported path traversal issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePath traversal vulnerability in Nokia Single RAN baseband software where a crafted SOAP 'provision' operation message with a malicious PlanId field can access files outside intended directories. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 24R1-SR 1.0 MP within the MNO internal RAN management network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Nokia Single RAN software versionAccess the baseband software management interface or use the command line tool provided by Nokia (typically via OSS or netconf interface) to query the installed software version. Common commands include 'show software version' or checking the system information via the Nokia RAN management portal.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 24R1-SR 1.0 MP (e.g., 23R2, 24R0, etc.)
-
Verify SOAP provision interface is accessibleCheck if the SOAP-based provisioning interface is enabled and reachable on the RAN management network. This is typically exposed on ports 8080, 8443, or custom ports configured for the Nokia RAN element manager. Review network access control lists and firewall rules surrounding the baseband units.Affected if The SOAP provision interface is exposed beyond the trusted MNO internal management network or is accessible without proper network segmentation.
-
Identify PlanId field handling in provision operationsExamine the SOAP provision operation messages processed by the baseband software. If you have access to logs or can capture/probe the interface, review how the PlanId parameter is validated. In affected versions, no input validation prevents path traversal sequences (../) in the PlanId field.Affected if The system processes PlanId fields without validating for path traversal characters, allowing access outside intended directories.
-
Assess network exposure of RAN management interfacesReview the network topology and access controls for the internal RAN management network. Determine if the baseband management interfaces (where SOAP provision runs) are isolated from untrusted networks or if any external access paths exist.Affected if The management interface is accessible from network segments outside the trusted MNO internal RAN management network, increasing exploitation risk.
You are affected if your Nokia Single RAN baseband software version is earlier than 24R1-SR 1.0 MP and the SOAP provision interface is accessible within your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to release 24R1-SR 1.0 MP or later which implements PlanId field input validation to prevent path traversal attacks. Since this is internal network infrastructure, verify the upgrade does not impact existing RAN provisioning workflows.
24R1-SR 1.0 MP
- Identify current Nokia Single RAN baseband software version in use
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Backup current system configuration before proceeding
- Upgrade Nokia Single RAN baseband software to release 24R1-SR 1.0 MP or later
- Verify the OAM service is running correctly after upgrade
- Confirm PlanId field input validations are active
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24330 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24330 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data