Folder Based Authorization StrategyApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2025-24401

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 217.vd5b_18537403e or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Folder-based Authorization Strategy Plugin 217.vd5b_18537403e and earlier does not verify that permissions configured to be granted are enabled, potentially allowing users formerly granted (typically optional permissions, like Overall/Manage) to access functionality they're no longer entitled to.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins Folder-based Authorization Strategy Plugin fails to verify that permissions configured to be granted are actually enabled. This allows users who were previously granted optional permissions (like Overall/Manage) to retain access to functionality they're no longer entitled to, creating an authorization bypass.

MitigationUpdate the Jenkins Folder-based Authorization Strategy Plugin to version 217.vd5b_18537403e or later once available, and verify that user permissions are correctly enforced after the update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Folder Based Authorization StrategyApplication
Affected:<= 217.vd5b_18537403e

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify the Folder-based Authorization Strategy plugin is installed
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Folder-based Authorization Strategy', or inspect the plugin directory $JENKINS_HOME/plugins for a folder-auth-strategy folder
    Affected if The plugin is present in the Jenkins installation
  2. Check the installed plugin version
    In Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, locate the Folder-based Authorization Strategy plugin and note the version number. Compare it against the affected range: <= 217.vd5b_18537403e
    Affected if The version is 217.vd5b_18537403e or earlier
  3. Confirm folder-based authorization is the active authorization strategy
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Global Security > Authorization section and verify that 'Folder-based Authorization Strategy' is selected as the current authorization method
    Affected if Folder-based Authorization Strategy is enabled as the authorization mechanism
  4. Identify if optional permissions were granted to users
    In the folder-based authorization configuration (Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security or at folder level), review all configured users and groups. Look specifically for optional permissions such as Overall/Manage, Overall/Configure, or other elevated permissions that can be selectively enabled
    Affected if Any users or groups have optional permissions configured in the authorization strategy

You are affected if the plugin is installed with version 217.vd5b_18537403e or earlier, folder-based authorization is active, and optional permissions have been granted to users who may retain access after those permissions should have been revoked.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 217.vd5b_18537403e
Interim mitigation

Update the Jenkins Folder-based Authorization Strategy Plugin to version 217.vd5b_18537403e or later once available, and verify that user permissions are correctly enforced after the update.

Fix this in Folder Based Authorization Strategy Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24401 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24401 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data