CVE-2025-24407
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A low privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform actions with permissions that were not granted leading to both a High impact to confidentiality and Low impact to integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Commerce contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability allowing low-privileged authenticated users to bypass security controls and perform actions beyond their granted permissions. The vulnerability affects multiple versions (2.4.8-beta1 through 2.4.4-p11) and enables unauthorized access without user interaction, resulting in high confidentiality impact and low integrity impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.3.3= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2= 1.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Adobe Commerce core versionRun 'composer show magento/product-community-edition 2>&1' or check composer.lock, or log into admin panel and navigate to System > Tools > Web Setup Wizard > System Upgrade to view versionAffected if Version falls within 2.4.8-beta1 through 2.4.4-p11 range (including 2.4.4-p11)
-
Identify Adobe Commerce B2B module versionRun 'composer show magento/module-b2b 2>&1' or check if B2B extension is listed in composer.lock under vendor/magento/module-b2bAffected if B2B module version is < 1.3.3, = 1.3.3, = 1.3.4, = 1.3.5, = 1.4.2, or = 1.5.0
-
Confirm B2B features are enabledLog into admin panel, navigate to Stores > Settings > Configuration > B2B Features, or check app/etc/config.php for 'Magento_B2b' module set to 1Affected if B2B features module is enabled (Magento_B2b = 1 in config.php)
-
Review user roles and permissions configurationLog into admin panel, navigate to System > Permissions > User Roles. Check if any roles grant elevated permissions beyond what the assigned user actually needsAffected if Users with low-privileged roles (such as limited catalog access) exist in the system and may have access beyond their intended permissions
Your environment is affected if Adobe Commerce core version is between 2.4.4-p11 and 2.4.8-beta1 AND the B2B module is installed and enabled with a vulnerable B2B version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.3
Apply vendor-supplied security patches for CVE-2025-24407 or upgrade to patched versions of Adobe Commerce (2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12 or later). Thoroughly test authorization controls after patching.
Commerce B2b version 1.3.6 or later
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Commerce B2b version by checking composer.json or the admin panel.
- 2. Confirm the current version is 1.3.3, 1.3.4, or 1.3.5 (or any version before 1.3.6).
- 3. Review the Adobe Commerce upgrade documentation at helpx.adobe.com for proper upgrade procedures.
- 4. Create a full backup of the database and files before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 5. Update the composer.json to require Commerce B2b version 1.3.6 or later: run `composer require magento/b2b:^1.3.6 --no-update` or the appropriate version constraint.
- 6. Run `composer update` to fetch and install the new version.
- 7. After composer update completes, run the Magento upgrade commands: `bin/magento setup:upgrade` followed by `bin/magento cache:clean`.
- 8. Verify the new version is installed by checking the admin panel or running `bin/magento --version`.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,576.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24407 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24407 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data