Incorrect AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-863

CVE-2025-24479

HIGH · 8.6 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-01-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
91/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Local Code Execution Vulnerability exists in the product and version listed above. The vulnerability is due to a default setting in Windows and allows access to the Command Prompt as a higher privileged user.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in Windows where a default configuration setting allows an attacker to access the Command Prompt (cmd.exe) with elevated privileges. The vulnerability enables a lower-privileged user to execute code as a higher-privileged account, likely through a Windows service, scheduled task, or system component that runs with elevated permissions and can be exploited to spawn a command shell.

MitigationHarden the affected Windows default settings by restricting or disabling the pathway that allows unprivileged users to invoke cmd.exe with elevated rights; review Windows service configurations, scheduled tasks, and UAC policies to ensure proper privilege boundaries.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Windows version and build
    Run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to determine the Windows version and build number
    Affected if Running an unpatched Windows version where the vulnerable configuration exists by default
  2. Check for unprivileged command prompt access paths
    Review installed Windows services, scheduled tasks, and startup programs for configurations that allow launching cmd.exe. Use 'schtasks /query /fo LIST /v' and check service configurations via 'sc qc <service_name>' for any that run with elevated privileges and expose command execution
    Affected if A service, scheduled task, or component runs with elevated privileges and can be manipulated by a low-privileged user to spawn cmd.exe
  3. Audit UAC policy settings
    Check registry key 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System' for UAC-related values such as 'EnableLUA', 'ConsentPromptBehaviorAdmin', and 'LocalAccountTokenFilterPolicy'
    Affected if UAC is disabled or configured to allow token elevation for standard users without proper consent prompts
  4. Verify privilege boundaries for built-in administrative tools
    Use 'whoami /all' to list current user privileges and group memberships. Check if the current user has SeImpersonatePrivilege or similar privileges that could be leveraged for privilege escalation
    Affected if A low-privileged user account possesses misconfigured privileges that allow impersonation or spawning elevated processes

A user is affected if their Windows system has a default configuration allowing an unprivileged account to invoke cmd.exe with elevated rights through a service, scheduled task, or system component.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Harden the affected Windows default settings by restricting or disabling the pathway that allows unprivileged users to invoke cmd.exe with elevated rights; review Windows service configurations, scheduled tasks, and UAC policies to ensure proper privilege boundaries.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24479 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24479 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data