Insufficiently Protected CredentialsWeakness · CWE-522

CVE-2025-24508

MEDIUM · 6.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
66/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Extraction of Account Connectivity Credentials (ACCs) from the IT Management Agent secure storage

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This vulnerability allows extraction of Account Connectivity Credentials (ACCs) from the secure storage of an IT Management Agent. Attackers with certain access could potentially retrieve stored credentials used for connecting to managed systems, leading to unauthorized lateral movement or access.

MitigationUpdate the IT Management Agent to the patched version. Rotate all Account Connectivity Credentials that may have been stored in the affected secure storage. Investigate logs for any signs of credential extraction or unauthorized access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IT Management Agent installation
    Locate the IT Management Agent software on the system. Common installation paths include /opt/, /usr/local/, or program directories. Check for processes named itmagent, itom, or similar management agent binaries.
    Affected if The IT Management Agent is present on the system
  2. Determine installed agent version
    Run the agent's version command (commonly 'agentctl version', 'itmagent --version', or check the About section in the management interface). Compare the version number against the vendor's advisory for patched versions.
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within the vulnerable version range as specified in vendor documentation
  3. Verify Account Connectivity Credentials are stored
    Examine the secure storage location used by the agent for credentials. This is typically configured in the agent's config file (commonly itm.conf, agent.cfg, or similar) under sections like 'credential_store', 'secure_storage', or 'acc_storage'.
    Affected if ACCs are configured and stored in the agent's secure storage
  4. Check for unauthorized access to credential storage
    Review agent audit logs, system audit logs (auditd, Windows Event Log), and security logs for events indicating access attempts to credential storage files or directories. Look for failed authentication, file access, or decryption failures.
    Affected if Suspicious access patterns or failed credential retrieval attempts are logged
  5. Inspect stored credential files
    If accessible, examine the credential storage files (often encrypted databases or vault files in the agent's data directory) for signs of tampering, unexpected modification timestamps, or unauthorized copy operations.
    Affected if Credential storage files show unexpected modifications or have been accessed by unauthorized processes

The environment is affected if the IT Management Agent is installed, uses vulnerable software versions, has ACCs stored in its secure storage, and shows signs of unauthorized access to credential storage.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the IT Management Agent to the patched version. Rotate all Account Connectivity Credentials that may have been stored in the affected secure storage. Investigate logs for any signs of credential extraction or unauthorized access.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24508 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24508 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data