CVE-2025-24607
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Northern Beaches Websites IdeaPush ideapush allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects IdeaPush: from n/a through <= 8.71.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA missing authorization vulnerability in the IdeaPush WordPress plugin (versions up to 8.71) allows attackers to bypass access control checks due to incorrectly configured security levels. The application fails to properly validate user permissions before granting access to sensitive functionality or data, potentially enabling unauthenticated or lower-privileged users to perform actions reserved for higher-privilege users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.73CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate IdeaPush plugin installationCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'ideapush' or 'ideapush-idea-pad' or similar Northernbeacheswebsites IdeaPush directoriesAffected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation
-
Identify installed IdeaPush versionOpen the main plugin file (usually ideapush.php or index.php inside the plugin folder) and locate the version comment/constant at the top, or check in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if The version number displayed is below 8.73 (versions 8.71 and below are affected)
-
Verify authorization on IdeaPush endpointsInspect the plugin's PHP files for capability checks before sensitive actions. Look for functions like current_user_can(), wp_get_current_user(), or permission callbacks on adminajax or REST API routesAffected if Sensitive functions lack proper current_user_can() checks or allow execution without validating user roles
-
Test access control on user-facing featuresCreate or use a low-privileged WordPress user account (subscriber level) and attempt to access IdeaPush admin functions - creating ideas, managing idea boards, accessing admin dashboard areas, or modifying other users' submissionsAffected if A lower-privileged user can perform actions reserved for administrators or moderators
-
Check IdeaPush admin configuration exposureNavigate to the IdeaPush settings area with different user roles and compare what each role can access. Look for admin pages under /wp-admin/admin.php?page=ideapush* or similarAffected if Non-administrator users can view or modify plugin settings that should require admin privileges
If the IdeaPush plugin version is below 8.73 AND sensitive functionality is accessible to lower-privileged or unauthenticated users without proper capability checks, the environment is vulnerable to this authorization bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.73
Upgrade IdeaPush to the latest version that includes proper authorization enforcement. Review and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) checks on all sensitive endpoints and functions.
8.73 or later
- Identify the currently installed IdeaPush version in your environment
- Access your Ideapush admin panel or check your deployment documentation to verify the current version
- If the version is 8.71 or lower (or any version below 8.73), initiate an upgrade to version 8.73 or later
- After upgrading, verify the new version number matches 8.73 or higher to confirm the patch was applied
- Test the access control functionality to ensure the authorization vulnerability has been remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24607 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24607 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data