CVE-2025-24749
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Overt Software Solutions LTD EZPZ SAML SP Single Sign On (SSO) allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects EZPZ SAML SP Single Sign On (SSO): from n/a through 1.2.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EZPZ SAML SP SSO plugin allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended state-changing actions (such as modifying SSO configuration) by leveraging the lack of anti-CSRF token validation on sensitive operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm EZPZ SAML SP SSO plugin is installedCheck your WordPress or CMS plugin directory for the EZPZ SAML SP SSO plugin files, or list installed plugins via admin interface or command lineAffected if The plugin is present in the environment
-
Identify installed plugin versionLocate the plugin's main file (usually named plugin.php or similar) and read the version header comment, or check the plugin's version file if one existsAffected if Version cannot be determined or is unknown (indicating potentially unpatched software)
-
Inspect SSO configuration forms for anti-CSRF tokensAccess the plugin's SSO configuration pages in the admin panel, view the HTML source of state-changing forms (settings, SSO configuration) and check if they contain hidden anti-CSRF token fields (often named nonce, csrf_token, or similar)Affected if Forms handling sensitive operations (SSO settings, configuration changes) lack visible anti-CSRF token fields
-
Verify token validation on form submissionSubmit a configuration change request and examine server-side code or intercept the response to determine if the submitted token is validated before processing the requestAffected if The plugin processes configuration changes without validating anti-CSRF tokens (requests succeed without token)
You are affected if the EZPZ SAML SP SSO plugin is installed and its sensitive forms (SSO configuration, settings) lack anti-CSRF token fields or server-side token validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement synchronizer token pattern (anti-CSRF tokens) on all state-changing forms and validate tokens on server-side processing; also consider checking Origin/Referer headers as additional defense.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation5.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24749 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24749 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data