CVE-2025-2475
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 10.5.x <= 10.5.1, 10.4.x <= 10.4.3, 9.11.x <= 9.11.9 fail to invalidate the cache when a user account is converted to a bot which allows an attacker to login to the bot exactly one time via normal credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMattermost fails to invalidate authentication cache when user accounts are converted to bot accounts, causing stale session data to persist. This allows an attacker to authenticate using the original user's credentials exactly once after the conversion, exploiting the gap between account type change and cache invalidation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.11.0, < 9.11.10>= 10.4.0, < 10.4.4>= 10.5.0, < 10.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Mattermost Server versionRun the command: grep -i version /opt/mattermost/config/config.json or use the Mattermost system console to view server version under About > MattermostAffected if The version falls within 9.11.0 to 9.11.9, 10.4.0 to 10.4.3, or 10.5.0 to 10.5.1
-
Review audit logs for user-to-bot conversionsAccess Mattermost audit logs via the System Console or check /var/log/mattermost/audit.log for events containing 'user_to_bot' or similar conversion actions, or query the database for accounts where account_type changed from User to BotAffected if Any user-to-bot account conversions have occurred and the server version is vulnerable
-
Identify bot accounts derived from user accountsQuery the Users table and Bots table in the Mattermost database to identify bot accounts that share the same username or email as previously existing user accounts, or review the audit log for 'createBot' events following 'updateUser' eventsAffected if Bot accounts exist that were converted from user accounts after the vulnerable version was installed
-
Check for stale sessions from converted accountsQuery the Sessions table in the Mattermost database for active sessions belonging to usernames that now exist only as bot accounts, or use the Mattermost CLI: mattermost user list sessions --user <username> for affected accountsAffected if Active sessions exist for accounts that were converted to bots, indicating the authentication cache was not invalidated
A user is affected if the Mattermost Server version is in the vulnerable range AND any user accounts have been converted to bot accounts, as stale sessions may still be active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.11.1010.4.410.5.2
Upgrade to Mattermost 10.5.2+, 10.4.4+, or 9.11.10+ to receive the patch, or ensure manual cache invalidation is performed immediately after any user-to-bot conversions.
Upgrade to 9.11.10, 10.4.4, or 10.5.2 (whichever corresponds to your current major.minor branch)
- Determine your current Mattermost Server version by checking the system console or running 'mattermost version'
- Stop the Mattermost Server service
- Backup your Mattermost database and configuration files
- For version 9.11.x: Upgrade to version 9.11.10 or later
- For version 10.4.x: Upgrade to version 10.4.4 or later
- For version 10.5.x: Upgrade to version 10.5.2 or later
- Verify the upgrade by checking the Mattermost Server version after restart
- Ensure the server starts successfully and test user authentication
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2475 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2475 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data