CVE-2025-24838
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper privilege management for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIntel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 contains an improper privilege management vulnerability in Ring 3 (user-mode) applications. An authenticated but unprivileged user with low-complexity attack requirements and no user interaction can potentially escalate privileges to higher levels, impacting system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.11001CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Intel Computing Improvement Program is installedOpen Windows Settings > Apps > Apps & features, or use Control Panel > Programs and Features, and search for 'Intel Computing Improvement Program' or 'Intel CIP' in the installed programs list.Affected if The program appears in the installed programs list, indicating Intel CIP is present on the system.
-
Locate the installed version numberRight-click on the Intel CIP entry in Programs and Features and select 'Change' or 'Properties', or look for version information in the 'Publisher' or 'Size' columns. Alternatively, navigate to the Intel CIP installation directory (typically in Program Files or Program Files (x86)) and locate a version file or executable properties.Affected if A version number is displayed for Intel CIP software.
-
Compare installed version against vulnerable thresholdCompare the discovered version number to the vulnerable version range. The vulnerable version is any version less than 2.4.11001. For example, versions like 2.4.0.XXX, 2.3.x.x, or earlier are all in the vulnerable range.Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.4.11001 (for example, 2.4.0.10000, 2.3.5.0, or any version starting with 2.x where x is less than 11001).
-
Check if Intel CIP service is activeOpen Services (services.msc) and look for a service related to Intel Computing Improvement Program or Intel CIP. Check if the service status is 'Running'.Affected if The Intel CIP service is running, meaning the vulnerable software is actively loaded in memory.
The system is affected if Intel Computing Improvement Program is installed and its version number is below 2.4.11001.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.11001
Update Intel(R) CIP software to version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 or later to remediate the improper privilege management vulnerability.
WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 (or version 2.4.11001)
- 1. Identify the current version of Intel(R) Computing Improvement Program installed on the system
- 2. Navigate to the Intel Product Security Center or Intel download page to obtain the fixed version
- 3. Download the Intel CIP software version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 (or 2.4.11001)
- 4. Follow Intel's standard software update procedure to apply the upgrade
- 5. Verify the installation was successful and confirm the new version matches the fixed release
- 6. Restart any affected services if prompted by the installer
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24838 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24838 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data