CVE-2025-24842
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled search path for the Intel(R) System Support Utility before version 4.1.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIntel System Support Utility before version 4.1.0 contains an uncontrolled search path vulnerability (also known as DLL hijacking). The application loads dynamic-link libraries from locations that may be writable by unprivileged users, allowing an attacker with local access to place a malicious DLL that gets executed with elevated (privileged) user rights when the application runs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Intel System Support Utility versionOpen Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features, or right-click the application executable > Properties > Details. Also check C:\Program Files\Intel\Intel(R) System Support Utility or similar installation folder for version info.Affected if Version is lower than 4.1.0 (e.g., 4.0.x, 3.x.x, etc.)
-
Locate the application installation directoryFind the folder where Intel System Support Utility is installed - typically C:\Program Files\Intel\Intel(R) System Support Utility or C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\Intel(R) System Support Utility.Affected if The installation folder exists and contains the application executable (ISSE.exe or similar)
-
Verify directory permissions are restrictiveRight-click the installation folder > Properties > Security tab. Check that Users,Authenticated Users, or other non-admin groups do not have Write or Modify permissions.Affected if Non-privileged users have Write or Modify access to the application folder, allowing DLL planting
-
Check system PATH for writable locationsRun 'echo %PATH%' in command prompt. For each directory listed, right-click > Properties > Security to verify non-privileged users do not have Write permissions.Affected if Any PATH directory (especially those before system directories) is writable by non-privileged users, enabling DLL hijacking via PATH search order
You are affected if Intel System Support Utility version is below 4.1.0 AND either the application directory or any PATH directory is writable by non-privileged users, allowing DLL hijacking with elevated privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Intel System Support Utility to version 4.1.0 or later. Until patched, ensure the application directory and system PATH locations are not writable by non-privileged users to prevent DLL planting.
Intel System Support Utility version 4.1.0
- Check the current installed version of Intel System Support Utility (typically via Help > About or Programs and Features)
- Navigate to the official Intel support website to download Intel System Support Utility version 4.1.0 or later
- Uninstall the current version of Intel System Support Utility through Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features
- Restart the system if prompted
- Install the downloaded Intel System Support Utility version 4.1.0 or later
- Verify the installation was successful and confirm the new version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24842 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24842 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data