CVE-2025-24860
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Cassandra allowing users to access a datacenter or IP/CIDR groups they should not be able to when using CassandraNetworkAuthorizer or CassandraCIDRAuthorizer. Users with restricted data center access can update their own permissions via data control language (DCL) statements on affected versions. This issue affects Apache Cassandra: from 4.0.0 through 4.0.15 and from 4.1.0 through 4.1.7 for CassandraNetworkAuthorizer, and from 5.0.0 through 5.0.2 for both CassandraNetworkAuthorizer and CassandraCIDRAuthorizer. Operators using CassandraNetworkAuthorizer or CassandraCIDRAuthorizer on affected versions should review data access rules for potential breaches. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.0.16, 4.1.8, 5.0.3, which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIncorrect authorization vulnerability in Apache Cassandra's CassandraNetworkAuthorizer and CassandraCIDRAuthorizer allows users with restricted datacenter access to modify their own permissions via DCL statements, bypassing intended access restrictions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0.0, < 4.0.16>= 4.1.0, < 4.1.8>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cassandra versionRun 'nodetool version' or execute 'SELECT release_version FROM system.local' via cqlshAffected if Version is 4.0.0-4.0.15, 4.1.0-4.1.7, or 5.0.0-5.0.2 (outside the fixed versions 4.0.16, 4.1.8, 5.0.3)
-
Determine which authorizer is configuredInspect cassandra.yaml for the 'authorizer' setting; common values are CassandraNetworkAuthorizer, CassandraCIDRAuthorizer, CassandraAuthorizerAffected if Authorizer is set to CassandraNetworkAuthorizer or CassandraCIDRAuthorizer
-
Verify network or CIDR restrictions existCheck for network_authorizer or cidrauthorizer configuration files, or query system_auth.permissions for permissions with 'datacenters' or 'ip_addresses' restrictionsAffected if Users exist with datacenter or IP restrictions configured in the authorizer
-
Audit recent permission changesQuery system_auth.permissions history if audit logging is enabled, or review application logs for DCL statements (GRANT, REVOKE, CREATE ROLE, ALTER ROLE) executed by users with restricted datacenter accessAffected if Users with restricted datacenters have modified their own permissions unexpectedly
You are affected if running a vulnerable Cassandra version AND using CassandraNetworkAuthorizer or CassandraCIDRAuthorizer with users that have datacenter or IP restrictions configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.0.164.1.85.0.3
Upgrade to Cassandra 4.0.16, 4.1.8, 5.0.3 or later. Review existing data access rules for potential unauthorized permission changes.
Upgrade to Cassandra 4.0.16, 4.1.8, or 5.0.3 (depending on current major version)
- Identify if CassandraNetworkAuthorizer or CassandraCIDRAuthorizer is in use in the cluster
- Review data access rules and audit logs for any unauthorized permission changes that may have occurred
- Determine the current Cassandra version (4.0.x, 4.1.x, or 5.0.x)
- Plan upgrade path: if on 4.0.x upgrade to 4.0.16, if on 4.1.x upgrade to 4.1.8, if on 5.0.x upgrade to 5.0.3
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- Perform the upgrade during a scheduled maintenance window
- After upgrade, verify that restricted users can no longer modify their own permissions via DCL statements
- Re-audit data access rules to ensure proper authorization is enforced
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24860 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24860 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data