CVE-2025-24914
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen installing Nessus to a non-default location on a Windows host, Nessus versions prior to 10.8.4 did not enforce secure permissions for sub-directories. This could allow for local privilege escalation if users had not secured the directories in the non-default installation location. - CVE-2025-24914
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNessus versions prior to 10.8.4 on Windows fail to enforce secure permissions on sub-directories when installed to a non-default location. This allows local unprivileged users to potentially modify executables or configuration files, leading to local privilege escalation if the directories are not manually secured by administrators.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Nessus is installed on WindowsLook for Nessus installation directories (commonly in Program Files or Program Files (x86)) or check for the presence of nessus.exe in typical installation pathsAffected if Nessus is not installed on the Windows system - this CVE only affects Nessus on Windows
-
Determine the installed Nessus versionLocate the nessus.exe or version file within the installation directory and read its version information, or check the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Tenable\Nessus for the InstallVersion valueAffected if The installed version is 10.8.4 or later - versions prior to 10.8.4 are affected by this vulnerability
-
Identify the installation locationNote the full path where the Nessus installation directory resides - check whether it was installed to the default location (typically C:\Program Files\Tenable\Nessus or C:\Program Files (x86)\Tenable\Nessus) or to a custom directoryAffected if Nessus is installed to its default location with default permissions - the vulnerability only applies when installed to a non-default (custom) location
-
Examine sub-directory permissionsRight-click on sub-directories within the Nessus installation folder, go to Properties > Security, and verify which users or groups have Write or Modify permissions. Use icacls from an elevated command prompt (e.g., icacls "C:\path\to\Nessus\*" ) to list effective permissions for standard usersAffected if Non-privileged users (such as Users orAuthenticated Users) have Write or Modify permissions on Nessus sub-directories - this permissive access on a non-default installation indicates vulnerability to local privilege escalation
A system is affected if Nessus for Windows is installed at a version prior to 10.8.4 in a non-default directory location, and non-privileged users have write access to Nessus sub-directories.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Nessus 10.8.4 or later which enforces secure directory permissions. For unpatched installations, manually restrict permissions on non-default installation directories to prevent write access by non-privileged users.
Nessus 10.8.4
- Check current Nessus version by navigating to the Nessus web interface and viewing the About page, or running 'nessusd --version' from the command line
- Download Nessus version 10.8.4 or later from the official Tenable downloads page (www.tenable.com/products/nessus)
- Back up the existing Nessus installation directory, configuration files, and plugin database before upgrading
- Stop the Nessus service: Open Services console, find 'Tenable Nessus', and click Stop
- Run the Nessus 10.8.4 installer and follow the prompts to upgrade the installation
- Start the Nessus service after installation completes: Open Services console and click Start for 'Tenable Nessus','Log into the Nessus web interface and verify the version displays 10.8.4 or later
- Verify that sub-directory permissions are correctly set: Right-click the installation folder, go to Properties > Security, and confirm only appropriate users/groups have access
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24914 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24914 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data