CVE-2025-24917
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Tenable Network Monitor versions prior to 6.5.1 on a Windows host, it was found that a non-administrative user could stage files in a local directory to run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges, potentially leading to local privilege escalation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in Tenable Network Monitor on Windows. A non-administrative user can place malicious files in a local directory that the application accesses, allowing arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM-level privileges. This typically occurs through DLL hijacking or binary planting where the privileged service loads a malicious file staged by a low-privilege user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Tenable Network Monitor is installedCheck the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for an entry named Tenable Nessus Network Monitor, or look for the program directory under C:\Program Files\Tenable\Nessus Network MonitorAffected if No entry or directory exists - the software is not installed and this CVE does not apply
-
Determine the installed versionQuery the registry value DisplayVersion in the same Uninstall key, or check the version info of the main executable in the installation directoryAffected if The version is lower than 6.5.1 (for example, 6.5.0, 6.4.x, etc.) - the version falls within the affected range
-
Identify the service accountOpen Services.msc, find the Tenable Network Monitor service, right-click and select Properties, or run 'sc qc <service_name>' from an elevated command promptAffected if The service runs under the SYSTEM, LocalSystem, or another highly privileged account - this is required for the privilege escalation to have impact
-
Check the service binary location and permissionsUse 'sc qc <service_name>' to find the binary path, then use icacls or PowerShell Get-Acl to examine folder permissions on the parent directoryAffected if A low-privilege user has Write or Modify permissions to the directory from which the service loads files - this would allow the user to place malicious DLLs or binaries for hijacking
The environment is affected if Tenable Network Monitor is installed with a version lower than 6.5.1 and the service runs with elevated privileges while allowing low-privilege users to write to directories from which the service loads executables.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.1
Upgrade Tenable Network Monitor to version 6.5.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
Nessus Network Monitor 6.5.1
- 1. Open the Nessus Network Monitor application interface
- 2. Navigate to the 'About' or 'Settings' section to verify the current version
- 3. If version is below 6.5.1, access the Tenable downloads portal at www.tenable.com/products/nessus/nessus-plugins
- 4. Download the Nessus Network Monitor version 6.5.1 installer for Windows
- 5. Run the installer with appropriate administrative privileges
- 6. Follow the on-screen installation prompts to complete the upgrade
- 7. After installation, restart the Nessus Network Monitor service
- 8. Verify the installed version is 6.5.1 by checking the About section
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24917 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24917 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data