CVE-2025-25060
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing authentication for critical function vulnerability exists in AssetView and AssetView CLOUD. If exploited, the files on the server where the product is running may be obtained and/or deleted by a remote unauthenticated attacker.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a missing authentication vulnerability in AssetView and AssetView CLOUD that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to obtain and/or delete files on the server where the product is running. The critical function lacks authentication controls, enabling direct file system access without credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm AssetView installationIdentify whether AssetView or AssetView CLOUD is running in your environment by reviewing installed software, running services, or web application footprintsAffected if AssetView or AssetView CLOUD is present
-
Determine if unauthenticated file access endpoints existReview application routing, API endpoints, or exposed servlets for file operation functionality (such as file download, file read, or file delete operations) that may be accessible without authenticationAffected if File operation endpoints are exposed without authentication checks
-
Check network exposure of AssetView servicesAssess whether AssetView web interfaces are accessible from untrusted networks or the public internet by reviewing firewall rules, network ACLs, and reverse proxy configurationsAffected if AssetView is reachable from untrusted networks without proper access controls
-
Test for authentication bypass on file operationsIf accessible, attempt to invoke file operation functions (such as file retrieval or file deletion) without providing credentials to determine if the function permits unauthenticated accessAffected if File operations execute without requiring authentication tokens or session credentials
-
Review authentication configuration for file access functionsExamine application configuration, security settings, or access control definitions related to file system operations to verify whether authentication enforcement is definedAffected if Authentication is not enforced on file access functions
A user is affected if AssetView or AssetView CLOUD is installed and the file access functionality is exposed without authentication controls, allowing unauthenticated file retrieval or deletion.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patch for AssetView/AssetView CLOUD when released. Until then, minimize attack surface by restricting network exposure, implementing web application firewall rules, and monitoring for unauthorized file access attempts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-25060 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-25060 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data