dbcve.org
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-25107

CRITICAL · 9.6 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in sainwp OneStore Sites onestore-sites allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects OneStore Sites: from n/a through <= 0.1.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the sainwp OneStore Sites WordPress plugin (versions <= 0.1.1) allows remote attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions such as site configuration changes or settings modifications through maliciously crafted requests.

MitigationUpdate OneStore Sites plugin to the latest patched version once available; alternatively, disable the plugin until patched.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify OneStore Sites plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'OneStore Sites' by sainwp, or inspect the plugin directory at /wp-content/plugins/onestore-sites/
    Affected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, find OneStore Sites, and view the version number displayed below the plugin name; alternatively, check the main plugin file (e.g., onestore-sites.php) for the 'Version' header in the file comments
    Affected if Version is 0.1.1 or lower (any version up to and including 0.1.1)
  3. Confirm plugin is active
    In WordPress admin > Plugins > Instored Plugins, verify that OneStore Sites shows as 'Active' under the plugin status
    Affected if Plugin is currently active on the site

User is affected if the sainwp OneStore Sites plugin is installed, active, and running version 0.1.1 or lower, allowingCSRF attacks against authenticated administrators to modify site configuration or settings.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update OneStore Sites plugin to the latest patched version once available; alternatively, disable the plugin until patched.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-25107 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-25107 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data