Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-25138

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rishi On Page SEO + Whatsapp Chat Button ops-robots-txt allows Stored XSS.This issue affects On Page SEO + Whatsapp Chat Button: from n/a through <= 2.0.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A CSRF vulnerability in the On Page SEO + Whatsapp Chat Button WordPress plugin (ops-robots-txt) allows attackers to inject malicious scripts through forged requests, resulting in Stored XSS. The plugin lacks proper CSRF token validation on its configuration forms and AJAX endpoints, enabling authenticated administrators to be tricked into submitting crafted requests that persist malicious code.

MitigationImplement nonces/CSRF tokens on all plugin forms and AJAX actions, validate the nonce server-side before processing requests, and use wp_nonce_field() and check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() for WordPress-native protection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify plugin installation and version
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'On Page SEO + Whatsapp Chat Button' or 'ops-robots-txt'. Note the installed version number from the plugin details.
    Affected if The plugin is installed and active, regardless of version (since no safe version is specified, assume all versions are potentially affected)
  2. Inspect plugin forms for CSRF tokens
    Navigate to the plugin settings page in WordPress admin. View the page source (right-click > View Page Source) and search for the form elements. Look for hidden input fields containing 'nonce' or '_wpnonce' within the plugin's configuration forms.
    Affected if The plugin forms lack _wpnonce or nonce hidden fields, indicating missing CSRF protection
  3. Check AJAX endpoint nonce validation
    Access the plugin directory via FTP or file manager. Locate the main plugin PHP file and any AJAX handler files. Search for 'wp_ajax_' actions and check if they include wp_verify_nonce(), check_admin_referer(), or wp_nonce_field() calls before processing requests.
    Affected if AJAX endpoints do not verify nonces before processing form data
  4. Identify stored XSS injection points
    In the plugin settings, locate any fields that accept user input and are stored in the database (options, settings, or custom post types). Check if input is sanitized using functions like esc_html(), esc_attr(), or sanitize_text_field() before saving.
    Affected if Plugin saves user input without proper sanitization, allowing stored XSS payloads to persist

A user is affected if the On Page SEO + Whatsapp Chat Button plugin is installed and its configuration forms or AJAX endpoints lack server-side nonce/CSRF token validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement nonces/CSRF tokens on all plugin forms and AJAX actions, validate the nonce server-side before processing requests, and use wp_nonce_field() and check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() for WordPress-native protection.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-25138 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-25138 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data