CVE-2025-25220
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') issue exists in +F FS010M versions prior to V2.0.1_1101. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by a remote authenticated attacker.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in +F FS010M devices prior to firmware V2.0.1_1101 allows remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements in user input. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation when processing commands through the device interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is +F FS010MAccess the device web interface or CLI and identify the exact model number displayed in system information or device statusAffected if The device is not a +F FS010M model - different models have different vulnerability statuses
-
Check firmware versionAccess the device administrative interface and navigate to firmware/version information page, or use CLI command to display firmware versionAffected if Firmware version is prior to V2.0.1_1101 - versions before this threshold contain the vulnerability
-
Verify remote authentication is enabledCheck device security or access settings to determine if remote administrative access/authentication is configured and activeAffected if Remote authentication is enabled - the vulnerability requires remote authenticated attackers to inject commands
Device is affected if it is a +F FS010M model running firmware version prior to V2.0.1_1101 with remote authentication enabled, as the vulnerability allows authenticated remote attackers to inject OS commands through insufficient input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade +F FS010M firmware to version V2.0.1_1101 or later. Until patched, minimize device exposure to untrusted networks and enforce strong authentication to reduce attack surface.
V2.0.1_1101
- Contact the vendor (+F/FS010M support) to obtain the official firmware update to version V2.0.1_1101
- Follow the vendor's documented firmware upgrade procedure for the FS010M device
- After upgrading, verify the device is running version V2.0.1_1101 or later
- Confirm the vulnerability is no longer present by testing authenticated operations that previously could trigger command injection
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,048.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-25220 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-25220 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data