Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)Weakness · CWE-918

CVE-2025-25229

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability. A malicious actor with user privileges may be able to access restricted internal system information, potentially enabling enumeration of internal network resources.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability allowing authenticated users to make the server make unintended requests to internal resources. A malicious user with standard privileges can exploit this to access restricted internal system information and enumerate internal network resources that should not be externally accessible.

MitigationApply vendor patches or configuration changes to restrict outbound request capabilities and validate all user-supplied URLs server-side. Implement network segmentation to limit internal resource accessibility from the UEM server.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Workspace ONE UEM installation
    Locate the UEM console installation and identify the server hosting the management console. Check for 'Workspace ONE UEM' or 'AirWatch' in installed software or running services.
    Affected if The system is running Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM software.
  2. Identify the installed UEM version
    Log into the UEM admin console and navigate to Settings > System > About, or check the installer version on the server. Compare the version number to any released patch information from Omnissa.
    Affected if The installed version has not been patched for CVE-2025-25229.
  3. Verify URL-based API endpoints are accessible
    Check if the UEM API or console allows user-supplied URLs in any feature (e.g., software distribution URLs, proxy settings, webhook configurations). Examine the admin console for fields accepting external URLs.
    Affected if Users with standard privileges can input arbitrary URLs through console features or APIs.
  4. Review server logs for suspicious outbound requests
    Examine UEM server logs (typically in the logs or diagnostic directory) for requests originating from the server to internal IP ranges (10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x, 172.16-31.x.x) or internal hostnames that were not initiated by administrators.
    Affected if Logs show the server making requests to internal network addresses that were not explicitly configured by administrators.
  5. Check network segmentation on the UEM server
    Review firewall rules or network policies restricting outbound connections from the UEM server. Verify if the server can reach internal database servers, internal management interfaces, or cloud metadata endpoints.
    Affected if The UEM server has unrestricted outbound network access to internal resources.

A user is affected if they run an unpatched version of Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM where standard-privilege users can submit URLs through the console, and the server has network access to internal resources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches or configuration changes to restrict outbound request capabilities and validate all user-supplied URLs server-side. Implement network segmentation to limit internal resource accessibility from the UEM server.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,260
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,816.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-25229 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-25229 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data