CVE-2025-25763
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedcrmeb CRMEB-KY v5.4.0 and before has a SQL Injection vulnerability at getRead() in /system/SystemDatabackupServices.php
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability exists in the getRead() function within /system/SystemDatabackupServices.php in crmeb CRMEB-KY v5.4.0 and prior versions. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through unsanitized input, potentially enabling unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify CRMEB versionLocate the version file (often version.php, composer.json, or a config/version file in the application root) and note the installed version numberAffected if Version is 5.4.0 or lower (any version prior to or equal to 5.4.0)
-
Locate vulnerable fileVerify the existence of /system/SystemDatabackupServices.php in the application directory structureAffected if File exists and the application is CRMEB-KY version 5.4.0 or prior
-
Examine getRead() functionOpen SystemDatabackupServices.php and locate the getRead() function definition. Inspect whether function parameters are used directly in SQL queries without proper escaping or parameterized queriesAffected if getRead() function exists and processes user input directly into SQL without sanitization
-
Check backup service accessibilityDetermine if the backup service endpoint/module is accessible to unauthenticated or low-privilege users by reviewing routing configuration and access controlsAffected if Backup functionality is exposed and reachable without requiring elevated privileges that would prevent SQL injection exploitation
-
Review database user privilegesCheck the database credentials used by the application - verify if they have excessive privileges (such as DROP, GRANT, or access to other databases) that could be exploitedAffected if Application database user has more privileges than required for normal operation
Environment is affected if running CRMEB-KY version 5.4.0 or prior with the SystemDatabackupServices.php file containing the vulnerable getRead() function that processes unsanitized SQL input and is accessible to attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and use parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations in the getRead() function. Apply the latest vendor patch when available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-25763 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-25763 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data