CVE-2025-26326
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in the NVDA Remote (version 2.6.4) and Tele NVDA Remote (version 2025.3.3) remote connection add-ons, which allows an attacker to obtain total control of the remote system by guessing a weak password. The problem occurs because these add-ons accept any password entered by the user and do not have an additional authentication or computer verification mechanism. Tests indicate that more than 1,000 systems use easy-to-guess passwords, many with less than 4 to 6 characters, including common sequences. This allows brute force attacks or trial-and-error attempts by malicious invaders. The vulnerability can be exploited by a remote attacker who knows or can guess the password used in the connection. As a result, the attacker gains complete access to the affected system and can execute commands, modify files, and compromise user security.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNVDA Remote (2.6.4) and Tele NVDA Remote (2025.3.3) accept any user-provided password without additional authentication or verification mechanisms. This allows attackers to gain complete system control via brute force or guessable passwords (under 4-6 characters, common sequences).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed NVDA Remote product and versionCheck the installed add-on version in NVDA's Add-ons Manager (NVDA menu > Tools > Manage Extensions) or look for version information in the add-on's about/settings dialogAffected if The installed version is NVDA Remote 2.6.4 or Tele NVDA Remote 2025.3.3 (or any version within these major releases that has not been patched)
-
Examine the configured remote access passwordOpen the NVDA Remote add-on settings (NVDA menu > Tools > Remote > Connect or Configure) and review the current password length and complexityAffected if The password is fewer than 4-6 characters long, consists of common sequences (1234, password, admin, etc.), or uses simple patterns without special characters or numbers
-
Verify if additional authentication mechanisms are enabledCheck the NVDA Remote settings for computer verification, 2FA, or other secondary authentication layers that require approval before granting remote accessAffected if No additional authentication mechanisms (such as computer verification, 2FA, or access approval prompts) are configured or enabled in the remote settings
The environment is affected if running NVDA Remote 2.6.4 or Tele NVDA Remote 2025.3.3 with a weak password (under 4-6 characters or common patterns) and without additional authentication safeguards.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedEnforce strong password policies (minimum length, complexity requirements) and implement additional authentication mechanisms such as two-factor authentication or computer verification before granting remote access.
Check nvdaremote.com or nvda-addons.org for NVDA Remote and Tele NVDA Remote versions newer than 2.6.4 and 2025.3.3 respectively
- Check the NVDA Remote add-on version currently installed by opening NVDA menu > Tools > Remote > Help > About
- Visit the NVDA Remote official page at nvdaremote.com or the add-ons page at nvda-addons.org to identify if a newer version has been released that addresses the weak authentication vulnerability
- If a newer version is available, download and install the updated add-on from the official source
- After upgrading, configure a strong password for remote connections - use a password with at least 12 characters including uppercase, lowercase, numbers, and special characters
- Consider enabling any additional security features or two-factor authentication mechanisms if provided in the updated version
- Restart NVDA for changes to take effect
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26326 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26326 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data