CVE-2025-26363
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA CWE-306 "Missing Authentication for Critical Function" in maxprofile/setup/routes.lua in Q-Free MaxTime less than or equal to version 2.11.0 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to enable an authentication profile server via crafted HTTP requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA missing authentication vulnerability exists in maxprofile/setup/routes.lua of Q-Free MaxTime versions 2.11.0 and prior. The route responsible for enabling the authentication profile server lacks authentication checks, allowing any unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger this critical function via specially crafted HTTP requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify MaxTime versionLocate the MaxTime installation and determine its version number (typically visible in the application UI, about screen, or installation metadata). Compare this version against the affected range: version 2.11.0 or prior.Affected if Installed version is 2.11.0 or lower
-
Locate vulnerable Lua scriptSearch for the file maxprofile/setup/routes.lua within the MaxTime installation directory. This file contains the route that lacks authentication.Affected if The file exists in the installation and originates from an affected version
-
Verify endpoint accessibilitySend a crafted HTTP request to the endpoint that enables the authentication profile server (typically found within the setup routes). Observe whether the request succeeds without providing any authentication credentials.Affected if The endpoint responds successfully without requiring authentication headers or credentials
-
Check route configurationExamine the routes.lua file directly to confirm that the enable function for the authentication profile server has no authentication middleware or access controls defined.Affected if The route handler lacks authentication checks (no middleware, no require_auth, no session validation)
-
Confirm service exposureDetermine whether the MaxTime web interface or API is exposed to untrusted networks. Check network bindings and firewall rules.Affected if The service is accessible from networks where untrusted attackers could reach it
You are affected if running MaxTime version 2.11.0 or prior AND the setup routes for enabling the authentication profile server are accessible without any authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch (version > 2.11.0) to add proper authentication checks to the setup routes, specifically restricting access to the authentication profile server enable function to authorized users only.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26363 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26363 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data