CVE-2025-26571
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wibiya Wibiya Toolbar wibiya allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Wibiya Toolbar: from n/a through <= 2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wibiya Toolbar allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions on the toolbar. The CVSS 7.1 score indicates the vulnerability affects sensitive functionality that could lead to unauthorized state-changing operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Wibiya Toolbar is installedSearch your web application files and dependencies for Wibiya Toolbar components, scripts, or related modules. Check your frontend dependencies and browser-accessible scripts for 'wibiya' or 'toolbar' references.Affected if Wibiya Toolbar components are found in your environment and the toolbar is actively loaded in user browsers.
-
Verify anti-CSRF token presence in state-changing requestsUse browser developer tools to intercept toolbar-related POST/PUT/DELETE requests. Inspect request payloads and headers for anti-CSRF tokens or similar security tokens.Affected if State-changing toolbar requests (such as settings modifications, user preferences, or content changes) lack anti-CSRF tokens in their payloads.
-
Check server-side Origin/Referer header validationReview server-side code handling toolbar requests. Verify that the application validates Origin or Referer headers before processing state-changing operations.Affected if Toolbar state-changing endpoints do not validate Origin or Referer headers to confirm the request originated from your legitimate site.
-
Inspect session cookie SameSite attributeUsing browser developer tools, examine cookies set by your application. Check the SameSite attribute on session cookies related to toolbar authentication.Affected if Session cookies used for toolbar authentication do not have the SameSite attribute set, or are set to 'None' without Secure flag.
-
Test for CSRF vulnerability via proof-of-conceptFrom an external origin (different domain), craft a request mimicking a toolbar state-changing action. Observe whether the server accepts and processes the request without requiring additional verification.Affected if The server successfully processes state-changing toolbar requests originating from a cross-site context without rejecting them.
Your environment is affected if Wibiya Toolbar is present and any of the following are true: state-changing requests lack anti-CSRF tokens, server-side Origin/Referer validation is missing, or authentication cookies lack proper SameSite restrictions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing requests, validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and set SameSite attribute on session cookies to prevent cross-site requests.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26571 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26571 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data