Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-26578

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mathieuhays Simple Documentation client-documentation allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Simple Documentation: from n/a through <= 1.2.8.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Simple Documentation plugin <= 1.2.8 allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts through Stored XSS by tricking administrators into submitting crafted requests.

MitigationUpdate to patched version when available; otherwise implement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and apply proper input sanitization and output encoding to prevent stored XSS.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Simple Documentation plugin is installed
    Access your WordPress admin panel, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and search for 'Simple Documentation' or 'Simple Docs'. Confirm the plugin is present and activated.
    Affected if The plugin is installed and active in the WordPress environment.
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In the Plugins list, locate Simple Documentation and view the version number displayed beneath the plugin name. Compare this against the affected range: any version <= 1.2.8 is vulnerable.
    Affected if The installed version number is 1.2.8 or lower.
  3. Identify state-changing admin actions
    Review the plugin admin interface for features that accept and store user input, such as creating/editing documentation pages, managing categories, or saving settings. These are the endpoints where XSS payload injection could occur.
    Affected if The plugin provides admin-facing forms or interfaces that accept user input and store it for later display.
  4. Confirm absence of CSRF token protection
    Inspect the HTML source of the plugin admin forms. Look for a hidden input field containing a CSRF token (commonly named '_wpnonce', 'nonce', 'csrftoken', or similar) and verify the form submits this token with the request.
    Affected if The plugin forms lack CSRF token fields, or the submitted requests do not validate tokens server-side.

If Simple Documentation plugin is installed with version 1.2.8 or lower and exposes admin forms without CSRF token protection, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to patched version when available; otherwise implement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and apply proper input sanitization and output encoding to prevent stored XSS.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Latest version of Simple Documentation (vendor repository) - any version higher than 1.2.8

  1. 1. Update the Simple Documentation plugin to the latest available version from the WordPress plugin repository or the vendor's official source
  2. 2. Verify the update was successful by checking the plugin version in the WordPress admin panel
  3. 3. Test the plugin functionality to ensure the update did not break existing features
  4. 4. Clear any cache if the site uses caching plugins
  5. 5. Consider running a security scan to confirm the vulnerability is resolved
Caveat Check plugin changelog for potential breaking changes between 1.2.8 and the new version before updating

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26578 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26578 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data