CVE-2025-26595
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer overflow flaw was found in X.Org and Xwayland. The code in XkbVModMaskText() allocates a fixed-sized buffer on the stack and copies the names of the virtual modifiers to that buffer. The code fails to check the bounds of the buffer and would copy the data regardless of the size.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the XkbVModMaskText() function within X.Org and Xwayland. The function allocates a fixed-size buffer on the stack and copies virtual modifier names into it without validating the buffer size, allowing an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory by providing excessively long modifier names.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0all versions< 21.1.16< 24.1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed X.Org X Server versionRun 'Xorg -version' or check the installed package version with 'rpm -q xorg-x11-server' (RHEL) or 'dpkg -l xserver-xorg-core' (Debian)Affected if Version is lower than 21.1.16
-
Identify installed Xwayland versionRun 'Xwayland --version' or check the package version with 'rpm -q xwayland' (RHEL) or 'dpkg -l xwayland' (Debian)Affected if Version is lower than 24.1.6 and Xwayland is in use
-
Identify installed TigerVNC versionRun 'vncserver -version' or check the package version with 'rpm -q tigervnc' (RHEL) or 'dpkg -l tigervnc-standalone-server' (Debian)Affected if TigerVNC is installed (all versions are affected)
-
Check if X keyboard extension (Xkb) with virtual modifiers is in useExamine X configuration files (/etc/X11/xorg.conf, ~/.xkb or active Xkb symbols) for virtual modifier definitions using 'xkbcomp' or review X log files for Xkb initialization messagesAffected if Virtual modifiers are configured and the Xkb extension is active
You are affected if you are running X Server < 21.1.16, Xwayland < 24.1.6, or any version of TigerVNC, AND the X keyboard extension with virtual modifiers is enabled in your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.1.1624.1.6
Apply the vendor patch for CVE-2025-26595 which adds proper bounds checking to the XkbVModMaskText() function. Until a patch is available, limit access to keyboard configuration utilities and monitor for unusual X11/Xwayland crash logs.
X Server 21.1.16 or later; Xwayland 24.1.6 or later; Red Hat Enterprise Linux updates via RHSA (check access.redhat.com for specific erratum)
- 1. Identify the vulnerable package: For RHEL/CentOS, check if xorg-x11-server or xwayland is installed using 'rpm -qa | grep -E "xorg-x11-server|xwayland"'
- 2. For Tigervnc, check installed version using 'vncserver -version' or 'rpm -qa | grep tigervnc'
- 3. For RHEL systems, apply updates via 'yum update' or 'dnf update' for the affected packages (xorg-x11-server, xwayland, tigervnc)
- 4. If specific CVE patches are available from Red Hat, apply them using 'yum update --cve CVE-2025-26595' or download from Red Hat errata
- 5. After updating, restart the X server or wayland session for changes to take effect
- 6. Verify the fix by checking the updated version matches or exceeds: X Server 21.1.16, Xwayland 24.1.6
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26595 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- lists.debian.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26595 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data