CVE-2025-26601
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA use-after-free flaw was found in X.Org and Xwayland. When changing an alarm, the values of the change mask are evaluated one after the other, changing the trigger values as requested, and eventually, SyncInitTrigger() is called. If one of the changes triggers an error, the function will return early, not adding the new sync object, possibly causing a use-after-free when the alarm eventually triggers.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in X.Org and Xwayland where changing an alarm triggers sequential evaluation of change mask values, calling SyncInitTrigger(). When an error occurs during one of these changes, the function returns early without properly adding the new sync object, leading to a use-after-free condition when the alarm subsequently triggers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0all versions< 21.1.16< 24.1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed X.org X Server versionRun 'Xorg -version' or check package version with 'rpm -qa | grep xorg-x11-server' (RHEL) or 'dpkg -l | grep xserver-xorg' (Debian/Ubuntu)Affected if Version is lower than 21.1.16
-
Check installed Xwayland versionRun 'Xwayland --version' or check package version with 'rpm -qa | grep xwayland' (RHEL) or 'dpkg -l | grep xwayland' (Debian/Ubuntu)Affected if Version is lower than 24.1.6
-
Identify if running Xwayland sessionCheck environment variable 'XDG_SESSION_TYPE' or look for Xwayland process with 'ps aux | grep Xwayland'Affected if Xwayland is in use and version is vulnerable (see versions above)
-
Check Red Hat Enterprise Linux versionRun 'cat /etc/redhat-release' or 'rpm -q redhat-release'Affected if Version is 7.0, 8.0, or 9.0 and X components are installed from RHEL repositories
-
Check if TigerVNC is installedRun 'vncserver -version' or 'rpm -qa | grep tigervnc' (RHEL)Affected if TigerVNC is installed (all versions affected)
-
Confirm X server is actively runningCheck for Xorg or Xwayland process with 'ps aux | grep -E "Xorg|Xwayland"' or check display manager statusAffected if An X server is running - this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable
You are affected if you run X.org X Server below 21.1.16, Xwayland below 24.1.6, any TigerVNC version, or RHEL 7.0/8.0/9.0 with X components, and the X server/Xwayland is actively running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.1.1624.1.6
Apply available vendor patches for X.Org and Xwayland that address the improper error handling in the alarm change code path to prevent the use-after-free. Consider restricting alarm creation/modification privileges until patches are applied.
X Server 21.1.16 or later; Xwayland 24.1.6 or later; RHEL systems should update via relevant RHSA
- Update X Server to version 21.1.16 or later
- Update Xwayland to version 24.1.6 or later
- For Red Hat Enterprise Linux systems, apply the corresponding Red Hat Security Advisory (RHSA) updates for this CVE
- Restart X.org or Xwayland after applying updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26601 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- lists.debian.org
- security.netapp.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26601 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data