CVE-2025-26677
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled resource consumption in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUncontrolled resource consumption in Microsoft Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by exhausting server resources, likely through malformed or excessive RDP Gateway requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.8066< 10.0.17763.7314< 10.0.20348.3692< 10.0.25398.1611< 10.0.26100.4061CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Remote Desktop Gateway service is installedOpen Services console (services.msc) and look for 'Remote Desktop Gateway' service, or run 'Get-Service -Name SessionEnv' in PowerShellAffected if the Remote Desktop Gateway service exists on the system
-
Confirm the service is runningIn Services console, check the Status column for Remote Desktop Gateway, or run 'Get-Service -Name SessionEnv | Select-Object Status' in PowerShellAffected if the service is running or set to start automatically
-
Check Windows Server build numberRun 'winver' command or 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object OsBuildNumber,OsVersion' in PowerShell to obtain the exact build numberAffected if the build number is below the threshold for your Windows Server version (Server 2016: < 14393.8066, Server 2019: < 17763.7314, Server 2022: < 20348.3692, Server 2022 23h2: < 25398.1611, Server 2025: < 26100.4061)
-
Verify network exposure of RD GatewayCheck if port 443 (default RD Gateway port) is listening and exposed externally using 'netstat -an | findstr :443' or by reviewing firewall rulesAffected if the RD Gateway port is accessible from untrusted networks
You are affected if Remote Desktop Gateway service is enabled and your Windows Server build number falls below the specified threshold for your version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.806610.0.17763.731410.0.20348.3692
Apply Microsoft security updates when available; until then, restrict network access to RD Gateway ports (default 443) via firewall or VPN, and monitor for unusual resource consumption patterns.
Windows Server 2016 build 10.0.14393.8066 | Windows Server 2019 build 10.0.17763.7314 | Windows Server 2022 build 10.0.20348.3692 | Windows Server 2022 23h2 build 10.0.25398.1611 | Windows Server 2025 build 10.0.26100.4061
- Identify the current Windows Server version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' on the affected server
- Confirm the build number is below the fixed version for your Windows Server edition
- Apply the latest Windows cumulative update for your specific Windows Server version from Microsoft Update Catalog
- Alternatively, use Windows Update or Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) to deploy the security update
- Restart the server after applying the update to ensure the Remote Desktop Gateway Service is running the patched version
- Verify the fix by checking the installed updates and confirming the build number matches or exceeds 10.0.14393.8066 (Server 2016), 10.0.17763.7314 (Server 2019), 10.0.20348.3692 (Server 2022), 10.0.25398.1611 (Server 2022 23h2), or 10.0.26100.4061 (Server 2025)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26677 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26677 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data