CVE-2025-26781
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in L2 in Samsung Mobile Processor, Wearable Processor, and Modem Exynos 980, 990, 850, 1080, 2100, 1280, 2200, 1330, 1380, 1480, 9110, W920, W930, Modem 5123, and Modem 5300. Incorrect handling of RLC AM PDUs leads to a Denial of Service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the L2 (Layer 2) processing of Samsung Exynos mobile processors, wearable processors, and cellular modems allows incorrect handling of RLC AM (Radio Link Control Acknowledged Mode) Protocol Data Units, leading to a Denial of Service condition. The issue affects multiple Exynos chip generations used in mobile devices and wearables.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Exynos chipset model in the deviceCheck the device specifications, system information, or modem firmware details to confirm the Exynos chip model (e.g., W920, 1080, 980, 990, 850, 2200, 1330, or 1380)Affected if The device uses any of the following Exynos chips: W920, 1080, 980, 990, 850, 2200, 1330, or 1380
-
Confirm cellular modem or WWAN is enabledCheck device settings or system logs for active cellular/WWAN interface presence. On Android, check Settings > Network & Internet > SIM cards or examine /proc/sys/kernel/bootdebug for modem statusAffected if Cellular/WWAN functionality is active on a device with an affected Exynos chipset
-
Verify RLC AM protocol handling is in useExamine modem logs or cellular network connection details for RLC AM mode activity. This typically requires access to modem diagnostic logs (AT commands such as AT+CRLA or vendor-specific logs)Affected if The device maintains an active LTE/5G connection using RLC Acknowledged Mode (AM) on an affected Exynos chipset
A device is affected if it contains any of the listed Exynos chipsets (W920, 1080, 980, 990, 850, 2200, 1330, or 1380) and has cellular/WWAN functionality enabled, as all firmware versions of these chips contain the vulnerability in RLC AM PDU processing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided firmware/security updates from Samsung for affected devices. Since this is a hardware-level firmware issue in cellular modems, no configuration workarounds are available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26781 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26781 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data