CVE-2025-26908
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Gurmehub Kargo Entegratör kargo-entegrator allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Kargo Entegratör: from n/a through <= 1.1.14.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Gurmehub Kargo Entegratör allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user inputs. This could enable unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion of database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Gurmehub Kargo Entegratör installationSearch the system for files, services, or applications named 'Gurmehub' or 'Kargo Entegratör'. Check web server document roots for directories containing these names. Review installed software inventories if available.Affected if The product Gurmehub Kargo Entegratör is installed and running on the system.
-
Locate the application entry pointIdentify the main application file (e.g., index.php, default.aspx, app.js) for the Kargo Entegratör component. This is where user input would be processed.Affected if The application processes user input through its web interface.
-
Inspect database query handling codeReview the application source code for direct SQL query construction. Search for string concatenation or string formatting in database calls (e.g., 'SELECT * FROM', 'INSERT INTO' built with + or f-strings) rather than parameterized queries or an ORM.Affected if Code contains SQL queries built using string concatenation with user-supplied values.
-
Review database logs for anomalous queriesEnable and examine database logs. Look for unusual SQL syntax, UNION SELECT statements, OR 1=1 patterns, or comments (--) in query parameters that differ from normal application behavior.Affected if Database logs show SQL queries containing suspicious injection patterns or unexpected syntax.
-
Check web application logs for SQL injection probesReview web server access logs (Apache/nginx/IIS logs) for request parameters containing SQL metacharacters like single quotes ('), semicolons (;), UNION, SELECT, or comment markers in the Kargo Entegratör endpoints.Affected if HTTP requests to the application contain SQL injection payloads in query parameters.
The environment is affected if Gurmehub Kargo Entegratör is installed and the application uses unsanitized user input directly in SQL queries, as evidenced by code review or suspicious database/web log entries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations, perform comprehensive input validation, and apply the latest available patch from the vendor.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26908 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26908 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data