CVE-2025-26942
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Crocoblock JetTricks jet-tricks allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects JetTricks: from n/a through <= 1.5.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a missing authorization vulnerability in the Crocoblock JetTricks WordPress plugin. The flaw allows unauthenticated or unauthorized users to access certain functionality that should be restricted by access control lists (ACLs). The vulnerability stems from improper capability checks or nonce validation on specific plugin endpoints, enabling attackers to invoke privileged operations without proper authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify JetTricks plugin is installedLocate the JetTricks plugin directory in the WordPress installation at wp-content/plugins/jet-tricks/, or check via WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins for 'JetTricks'Affected if The plugin directory exists or the plugin appears in the WordPress admin plugin list
-
Determine installed JetTricks versionOpen the main plugin file (usually jet-tricks.php) and look for the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block, or check the version listed in the WordPress admin plugin pageAffected if The reported version is earlier than 1.5.2 (e.g., 1.5.1, 1.5.0, or earlier)
-
Identify accessible plugin AJAX or REST endpointsReview the plugin source code for registered AJAX actions (add_action calls with 'wp_ajax_' or 'wp_ajax_nopriv_') or REST API routes, noting which ones lack capability checks (current_user_can) or nonce validationAffected if Endpoints registered with wp_ajax_nopriv_ or missing current_user_can() checks are present in the code
-
Test unauthorized endpoint accessSend a request to the suspected vulnerable endpoint (identified in step 3) without authentication cookies or with a low-privilege user account to verify if the action executes without authorizationAffected if The endpoint returns successful execution or expected privileged data without requiring authentication or proper capability verification
You are affected if the JetTricks plugin is installed with a version earlier than 1.5.2 and any AJAX or REST endpoints lack proper capability checks or nonce validation, allowing unauthenticated or unauthorized access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate JetTricks to version 1.5.2 or later, which contains the authorization fix. Until the update is applied, consider disabling the plugin or restricting access to the affected endpoints via web server configuration.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26942 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26942 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data