Events Calendar*WordPress extension · Wpgeodirectory

CVE-2025-26967

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.3.15 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Stiofan Events Calendar for GeoDirectory events-for-geodirectory allows Object Injection.This issue affects Events Calendar for GeoDirectory: from n/a through <= 2.3.14.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a PHP Object Injection vulnerability in the Stiofan Events Calendar for GeoDirectory WordPress plugin. The flaw allows deserialization of untrusted data, potentially enabling attackers to instantiate arbitrary PHP objects, trigger magic methods, and achieve remote code execution. The vulnerability affects versions up to and including 2.3.14.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Events Calendar for GeoDirectory that implements safe deserialization (e.g., json_decode) instead of unsafe unserialize() calls, and add proper input validation on any user-controlled data passed to deserialization functions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Events Calendar*WordPress extension
Affected:< 2.3.15

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check plugin version in WordPress
    Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in WordPress admin. Locate 'Events Calendar for GeoDirectory' (or Stiofan Events Calendar) and read the version number displayed. Alternatively, check the plugin's main PHP file header for 'Version:' comment.
    Affected if The installed version is 2.3.14 or lower (any version before 2.3.15).
  2. Verify plugin is active
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and confirm the Events Calendar for GeoDirectory plugin has an 'Active' status.
    Affected if The plugin is active and running a vulnerable version.
  3. Identify vulnerable deserialization code
    Examine the plugin source code for calls to unserialize() that process data without prior sanitization. Look in files that handle event data, user submissions, or imported data. Common patterns include unserialize($_POST[...]), unserialize($_GET[...]), or unserialize from database fields that accept user input.
    Affected if Code contains unserialize() calls processing untrusted input without json_decode or validation.
  4. Check data input pathways
    Review how the plugin handles data submitted through forms, REST API endpoints, or imported files. Identify if $_REQUEST, $_POST, $_GET, or database values are passed directly to unserialize().
    Affected if User-controlled data flows into unserialize() without sanitization.

A user is affected if the Events Calendar for GeoDirectory plugin is active and running version 2.3.14 or lower, with unserialize() processing untrusted input present in the codebase.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.3.15 or later
Fixed in 2.3.15
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Events Calendar for GeoDirectory that implements safe deserialization (e.g., json_decode) instead of unsafe unserialize() calls, and add proper input validation on any user-controlled data passed to deserialization functions.

Recommended fix High confidence

Events Calendar for GeoDirectory version 2.3.15

  1. Update the Events Calendar for GeoDirectory plugin to version 2.3.15 or later through the WordPress plugin management interface
  2. Verify the update was successfully applied by checking the plugin version number

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Events Calendar* Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26967 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26967 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data