Infinera Mtc 9 FirmwareOperating system · Nokia

CVE-2025-27019

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 23.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Remote shell service (RSH) in Infinera MTC-9 version R22.1.1.0275 allows an attacker to utilize password-less user accounts and obtain system access by activating a reverse shell.This issue affects MTC-9: from R22.1.1.0275 before R23.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Infinera MTC-9 RSH (Remote Shell) service contains hardcoded or password-less user accounts that allow unauthenticated attackers to execute commands on the device. By activating a reverse shell through these accounts, attackers can gain full system access without credentials.

MitigationUpgrade Infinera MTC-9 firmware to R23.0 or later. If RSH is not required, disable the service. Restrict network access to RSH ports (typically 514) using firewalls or ACLs to prevent external exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Infinera Mtc 9 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:>= 22.1.1.0275, < 23.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify firmware version
    Access device CLI or web management interface and retrieve the current firmware version information
    Affected if Installed version is >= 22.1.1.0275 and < 23.0 (any 22.x.x version in this range)
  2. Confirm RSH service is enabled
    Check device configuration or running services to determine if the Remote Shell (RSH) service is active
    Affected if RSH service is enabled or running on the device
  3. Verify RSH port accessibility
    Scan network ports or review firewall rules to check if port 514 (RSH default) is open and reachable
    Affected if Port 514 is accessible from network segments that are not trusted or are externally facing
  4. Review RSH user accounts
    Examine device configuration for user accounts configured with RSH access permissions
    Affected if Any RSH-specific user accounts exist without proper authentication requirements

Device is affected if firmware version is within 22.1.1.0275 to 22.x and the RSH service is enabled and accessible on the network

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 23.0 or later
Fixed in 23.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Infinera MTC-9 firmware to R23.0 or later. If RSH is not required, disable the service. Restrict network access to RSH ports (typically 514) using firewalls or ACLs to prevent external exploitation.

Recommended fix High confidence

R23.0 or later

  1. 1. Access the Infinera MTC-9 device administration interface or console.
  2. 2. Verify the current firmware version is between R22.1.1.0275 and R23.0 (exclusive).
  3. 3. Download the official R23.0 firmware update from Infinera's authorized support channels.
  4. 4. Create a backup of the current device configuration before proceeding.
  5. 5. Initiate the firmware upgrade process following Infinera's standard upgrade procedure.
  6. 6. Verify the upgrade completed successfully and the device is running R23.0 or later.
  7. 7. Confirm the RSH service is no longer accessible without authentication.
Caveat Major firmware upgrades may introduce configuration or compatibility changes; review Infinera release notes before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Infinera Mtc 9 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27019 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27019 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data