OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2025-27234

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-09-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
75/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Zabbix Agent 2 smartctl plugin does not properly sanitize smart.disk.get parameters, allowing an attacker to inject unexpected arguments into the smartctl command. In Zabbix 5.0 this allows for remote code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Zabbix Agent 2 smartctl plugin fails to sanitize smart.disk.get parameters, enabling injection of arbitrary arguments into the smartctl command. This command injection flaw allows remote code execution in Zabbix 5.0 environments.

MitigationUpdate Zabbix to a patched version that properly sanitizes smartctl plugin parameters. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the Zabbix Agent and disable the smartctl plugin.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Zabbix Agent 2 installation
    Run 'zabbix_agent2 --version' or check for /usr/sbin/zabbix_agent2 binary, or look for zabbix-agent2 package via package manager (dpkg -l | grep zabbix or rpm -qa | grep zabbix)
    Affected if Zabbix Agent 2 is installed
  2. Verify smartctl plugin is present
    Check for the smartctl plugin file in the Zabbix Agent 2 plugins directory (typically /usr/lib/zabbix/plugins/ or /usr/lib64/zabbix/plugins/), or run 'zabbix_agent2 -p' to list available items and look for 'smart.disk.get'
    Affected if The smartctl plugin is loaded and smart.disk.get item is available
  3. Determine Zabbix Agent 2 version
    Run 'zabbix_agent2 --version' and capture the version number; compare against Zabbix 5.0.x branch (e.g., 5.0.0 through 5.0.x where the vulnerability exists)
    Affected if Version is within Zabbix 5.0.x branch
  4. Check for active smart.disk.get monitoring items
    Review Zabbix agent configuration files (zabbix_agent2.conf.d/) for 'smart.disk.get' items, or query the Zabbix server API/frontend for active items of type 'smart.disk.get'
    Affected if Any smart.disk.get item is configured and active

A user is affected if Zabbix Agent 2 version 5.0.x is running with the smartctl plugin enabled and the smart.disk.get item is configured for monitoring

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Zabbix to a patched version that properly sanitizes smartctl plugin parameters. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the Zabbix Agent and disable the smartctl plugin.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Zabbix 5.0.40+ or latest stable 6.0/7.0 LTS release

  1. 1. Identify the currently installed Zabbix Agent 2 version using: zabbix_agent2 --version
  2. 2. If running Zabbix 5.0.x, upgrade to the latest patched release in the 5.0 LTS series (e.g., 5.0.40 or later)
  3. 3. If running an older version, upgrade to the latest stable Zabbix release (6.0.x LTS or 7.0.x) which contains the fix
  4. 4. After upgrading, restart the Zabbix Agent 2 service: systemctl restart zabbix-agent2
  5. 5. Verify the smartctl plugin works correctly with: zabbix_agent2 -t smart.disk.get["<disk_device>"]
  6. 6. Review Zabbix server configuration to ensure only authorized hosts can request agent items
Caveat Minor - smart.disk.get parameter validation may reject previously accepted malformed input; test in staging before production deployment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27234 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27234 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data