CVE-2025-27355
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nicolas GRILLET Woocommerce – Loi Hamon loi-hamon allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Woocommerce – Loi Hamon: from n/a through <= 1.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WordPress plugin 'Woocommerce – Loi Hamon' (versions <= 1.1.0) allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of an authenticated administrator, leading to Stored XSS where malicious scripts are injected into the application and executed when other users view the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin installationCheck if the 'Woocommerce - Loi Hamon' plugin files exist in the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/). Look for a folder named 'woocommerce-loi-hamon' or similar variant containing the plugin files.Affected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress plugins directory, indicating the plugin is installed.
-
Identify installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (typically the primary file in the plugin folder) and locate the version declaration in the plugin header comment, or check the WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins to find the version number displayed for 'Woocommerce - Loi Hamon'.Affected if A version number is displayed for the plugin and it is readable.
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare the identified version number to the affected range. The vulnerable version range is any version <= 1.1.0.Affected if The installed version is 1.1.0 or lower (for example: 1.1.0, 1.0.9, 1.0.0, etc.).
-
Confirm plugin is activeIn the WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins and verify whether 'Woocommerce - Loi Hamon' shows as 'Active' rather than 'Inactive'.Affected if The plugin is active and running on the WordPress site.
A user is affected if the 'Woocommerce - Loi Hamon' plugin is installed, active, and running version 1.1.0 or lower, as this version range contains the CSRF vulnerability that can lead to stored XSS.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all forms and AJAX endpoints, add proper input validation and output escaping for user-supplied data, and update to a patched version if available from the vendor.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27355 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27355 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data