CVE-2025-27455
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe web application is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks. The site can be embedded into another frame, allowing an attacker to trick a user into clicking on something different from what the user perceives, thus potentially revealing confidential information or allowing others to take control of their computer while clicking on seemingly innocuous objects.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe application lacks proper X-Frame-Options or CSP frame-ancestors headers, allowing it to be embedded in iframes on malicious sites. Attackers can overlay invisible UI elements to hijack user clicks, potentially exposing sensitive data or executing unauthorized actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 0.16.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Endress Meac300 Fnade4 device on your networkLocate the device by checking network inventory, device documentation, or accessing the device management interface to confirm the model and firmware version.Affected if The device model matches Endress Meac300 Fnade4 with firmware version 0.16.0 or lower.
-
Determine the installed firmware versionAccess the device web interface or administrative console and navigate to the system information or firmware version section. Alternatively, check the device startup logs or use the vendor-provided diagnostic tool to query the firmware version.Affected if The firmware version is 0.16.0 or any version lower than 0.16.0.
-
Inspect HTTP response headers for X-Frame-OptionsUse a browser developer tool, curl, or a header inspection tool to capture HTTP responses from the device web interface. Look for the X-Frame-Options header in any response.Affected if The X-Frame-Options header is absent from all HTTP responses, or present but set to a weak value like ALLOW-FROM.
-
Inspect HTTP response headers for CSP frame-ancestorsExamine the Content-Security-Policy header in HTTP responses from the device. Specifically check if the frame-ancestors directive is configured.Affected if The CSP frame-ancestors directive is missing or not configured to restrict framing.
-
Test if the application can be embedded in an iframeCreate a test HTML page with an iframe pointing to the device web interface URL. Load the page in a browser and verify whether the content renders successfully within the iframe.Affected if The device interface loads successfully inside the iframe, confirming it can be framed by any origin.
You are affected if the Endress Meac300 Fnade4 firmware is version 0.16.0 or lower AND the X-Frame-Options and CSP frame-ancestors headers are missing or not properly configured, allowing the interface to be embedded in iframes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement X-Frame-Options: DENY or SAMEORIGIN header, or configure CSP frame-ancestors directive to restrict framing to trusted origins.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27455 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27455 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data